[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-3

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-4

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-5

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-6

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-7

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-8

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-9

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-10

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-11

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-12

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-13

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-14

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-15

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-16

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-17

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-18

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)-19

※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.

분야
등록일
페이지/형식
구매가격
적립금

레포트 > 사회계열
2010.09.27
19페이지 / docx
2,100원
63원 (구매자료 3% 적립)

자료 다운로드 네이버 로그인

IMF 체제를 통해 본 한국의 종속과 발전 - 위기, 기회 및 재앙 -

한국 영국 교육정책 공동세미나

[국제정치학][국제정치학 의의][국제정치학 목적][국제정치학 이론화과정][국제정치경제학]국제정치학의 역사, 국제정치학의 의의, 국제정치학의 목적, 국제정치학의 이론화과정, 국제정치학과 국제정치경제학 분석

[정치학] 동북아 평화형성

[국제정치] 2008년, 중국 베이징 올림픽이 중국의 강대국화에 갖는 함의

Retrenchment and Recalibration축소와 재측정 복지국가론 세미나

축소와 재측정 변화하는 어젠다 다양성에 따른재측정

남미 조사 - 칠레

국가공무원 영어기출문제(1993~2006년 9급,7급,국회8급기출문제집)

소개글

[국제정치학] International Regimes & Neo-Neo Debate(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.

I. Introduction
II. The Nature of International Regimes
1. Difficulty in Defining International Regimes
2. Definition of International Regimes
1) Stephen Krasner
2) Criticism and development
3. Classification of International Regimes
III. Globalization and International Regime
1. Connection between Globalization and International Regimes
2. IR Theories - Different View on Regime
3. Brief Introduction of Two major Schools: Realism and Neo-Liberalism
1) Common Assumptions
2) Different Assumptions
IV. Neo Realism
V. Liberal and Neo-Liberalism - in International Relations
1. Classical Liberalism
2. Neo-Liberalism
VI. The Neo-Neo Debate
1. The Shared Premises of Neo-liberalism and Neo-realism
2. The Differences between Neo-liberalism and Neo-realism
3. Understanding Arguments of Neo-Realism
4. Case Studies (1): NATO on Neo-Realism View
5. Case Study (2): UN (the League of Nations) on Neo-liberal View
6. Limitation of Neo-Neo Debate
VII. Conclusion

본문내용

3. Brief Introduction of Two major Schools: Realism and Neo-Liberalism
As the table shown above, realism and liberalism start from different viewpoints. As a result, two rational theories come to a distinct conclusion when it comes to judging international regimes. Even though their basic assumptions are going to largely coincide with each other during the academic neo-neo debate, views on international regimes still remain inflexible.

1) Common Assumptions
Both schools suppose a state, as a rational and unitary actor, is under an anarchic international system. Each state is responsible for establishing regimes, and those regimes are on the basis of reciprocal cooperation. In addition, regimes are empowered to promote international order. Therefore, both schools consider regimes to be the byproduct of states. Meanwhile Social Constructivists think the existence of rule or regime can make identical appearance of the world, but we do not handle Social Constructivism in this article to maintain the arguing point.

2) Different Assumptions
First of all, Liberal Instutionalists consider international regimes as the best mean to achieve peaceful world. In other words, regimes enable states to collaborate in a certain issue, and promote individual and common good. In the world of liberal institutionalists, there is a benign hegemon who is responsible for maintaining these regimes, so that many other states can gather together to discuss a certain common issue and ultimately achieve absolute gains.
On the other hands, Realists insist those kind of benefits are temporary and not absolute one even though they agree with the fact that regimes can make benefits to all participants. They think power is the central feature of regime formation and maintenance, but it is not hegemonic power. On top of that, regimes can make states coordinate together, but it is fragile and vulnerable in front of each country’s self-interests and gains.

IV. Neo Realism

The neo-realism is, on the contrary to traditional realism, emphasizing the structure of the system. The idea of structural realism started from neo-realist’s scholar, Kenneth N. Waltz who defines international and domestic political structures by using the similar method of traditional realists. Although Waltz accepts the realist paradigm of state as a rational actor, he focuses more on system of structure.
According to Waltz (1979), political structure is different between domestic and international. In terms of domestic structure, first, it is organized or ordered in hierarchic, and units are ordered through a central authority. Secondly, by the differentiation of units and the specification of their functions, which are noted through the relations between the supra and subordinate units and their specification. Thirdly, it is defined by the distribution of capabilities across units to the extent to authorities.
By the same token, Waltz believes that international political structure is defined through first the way that its units is arranged, in this case the system is anarchic but balanced through units’ cooperation rather having a central authority. Secondly, the international political structure is defined by the character of the units the functions which they have. This drops out in this case since all units are same in their function. Lastly, the distribution of power among the units is the ‘patter’ where the power is distributed among the states. In addition, Waltz believes that any change in the above variable will lead to change in the system and alters the political structures.

Table 4. Waltz’s definitions of political structure
Domestic Structure International Structure
1. Hierarchic system Anarchic system
2. Differentiation of units/specification Character of unites and same function
3. Distribution of capabilities across units Distribution of power among states
(Source: Waltz (1979))

The distinction between classical realism and neo-realism can be featured as the table below. According to Lamy (2008), neo realism is different from classical realism in several aspects. In terms of international politics, neo realist thinks that it is affected by structure of anarchic system. However, classical realists see international politics as action and interaction of the state in unit level. Neo-realists think that cause of war is due to the features in the structure of international system, yet classical realists analyze as human nature, which is rational and selfish. Moreover, neo-realists see the interest of state as security within the anarchic system. However, classical realists focus on security of national state through accumulation of power. Lastly, power shapes state’s behavior in neo-realists’ point of views, whereas to classical realists, power is a mean and an end itself.

Table 5. Difference of Classical Realism and Neo-Realism
Classic Realism Neo-Realism
International pol

참고문헌

Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger (1997) “Theories of International Regimes” Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta Marriott Marquis and Atlanta Hilton and Towers, September 2- 5, 1999

Brahm, Eric (2005) “International Regimes- beyond Intractability Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess” Conflict Research Consortium Sep. 2005

Benjamin O. Fordham and Thomas C.Walker (2005) “Kantian Liberalism, Regime Type, and Military Resource Allocation: Do Democracies Spend Less?” International Studies Quarterly Vol.49: 141-157

Helmut Breitmeier, Marc A. Levy, Oran R. Young, and Michael Zürn (1996) “The International Regimes Database as a Tool for the Study of International Cooperation” International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis WP-96-160 December 1996

John Gerard Ruggie (1982) “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order” International Organization, Vol. 36, Issue 2: 379-415

John S. Odell (1999) “The Negotiation Process and International Economic Organizations”

Men Honghua “Critiques of the Theory of International Regimes: The Viewpoints of Main Western Schools of thought”

Robert Crawford. (1996) “Regime Theory in the Post-Cold War World: Rethinking Neoliberal Approaches to International Relations”

Stephen D. Krasner. (1983) “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regime as an intervening variables” International regimes

(Reference: Neo-Realism Part)

Grieco, Joseph. (1988) “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institution” International Organization, 485-507 from Steven L. Lamy (2008) “Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism” The globalization of world politics: An Introduction to international relations, ed. John Baylis et al. 126-137

Jervis, Robert. (1999) “Realism, Neo0liberalism and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate” International Security, 42-63 from Steven L. Lamy (2008) “Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism” The globalization of world politics: An Introduction to international relations, ed. John Baylis et al. 126-137

Lamy, Steven L. (2008) “Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism” The globalization of world politics: An Introduction to international relations, ed. John Baylis et al. 126-137

Mearsheimer (1990) “Back to the Future : Instability after the Cold War” International Security, 5-56 from Steven L. Lamy (2008) “Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism” The globalization of world politics: An Introduction to international relations, ed. John Baylis et al. 126-137 (1994/5) “The False Promise of International Institutions” International Security, 5-49 Steven L. Lamy (2008) “Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism” The globalization of world politics: An Introduction to international relations, ed. John Baylis et al. 126-137

Snyder, Jack (1991) “Myths of empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition, Cornell University Press from Steven L. Lamy (2008) “Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism” The globalization of world politics: An Introduction to international relations, ed. John Baylis et al. 126-137

Waltz, Kenneth. (1979) “Political Structure” Theory of International Politics, Addison-Wesley, 79-101.

(References: Neo-Liberalism Part)

Fukuyama, Fukayama. (1989) “The End of History.” National Interest, 16: 3-28

Fukuyama, Francis. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. NY: Avon.

Jackson, Robert H and Georg Sørensen. (2007) Introduction to International Relations. xford: Oxford University Press.

Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. (1989) Power and interdependence. Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown series in political science. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman.

O'Rourke, P. J., and Adam Smith. (2006) On the Wealth of Nations. New York, N.Y.: Atlantic Monthly Press.

Shalla, Vivian. (2006) Working in a Global Era. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press, 2006.

(References: Neo-Neo Debate Part)

Baldwin, David Allen. (1993) Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Columbia University Press.

Glaser, Charles L. (2003) Structural realism in a more complex world. Review of International Studies 29 (3).

Law, Alistair. (2007) NATO's Role In The Neo-Neo Debate. Cardiff University.

Lieb, Doug. (2004) The limits of neorealism: marginal states and international relations theory (World in Review). Harvard International Review.

Mearsheimer, John J. (1995b) A realist reply. International Security 20 (1)

Riim, Toomas. (2006) A constructivist view on a national interest and alliance behaviour. Baltic Security and Defence Review 8.

Alvarenga, Daniel. (2007) Neo-liberalism beats Neo-realism. http://politicsinmoti

#국제정치학 #NeoNeo #Neo #Regimes #Debate

오늘 본 자료

오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.

이 분야 인기자료

이 분야 신규자료