[사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)

 1  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-1
 2  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-2
 3  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-3
 4  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-4
 5  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-5
 6  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-6
 7  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-7
 8  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-8
 9  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-9
 10  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-10
 11  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-11
 12  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-12
 13  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-13
 14  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-14
 15  [사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)-15
※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.
  • 분야
  • 등록일
  • 페이지/형식
  • 구매가격
  • 적립금
자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
소개글
[사회조사방법론] 담배값 인상과 범죄율의 관계(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1. What is ‘Sin tax’ and what is happening? What is our research question?
2. The Literature Review: “Life time Medical Cost of Obesity: Prevention No Cure Increasing Health Expenditure” and “Taxing the Poor”
3. Setting specified independent and dependent variables and a hypothesis
4. More Literature Review before Testing our Hypothesis: “Crime and Poverty: Evidence from a Natural Experiment” and “Economic Inequality and the Rise in U.S. Imprisonment”
5. Testing our hypothesis with the method: The regression analysis.
6. Conclusion
7. What do we lack? What do we need more?
Reference
본문내용
4. More Literature Review before Testing our Hypothesis: “Crime and Poverty: Evidence from a Natural Experiment” and “Economic Inequality and the Rise in U.S. Imprisonment”
In previous section we set our hypothesis “Increasing Sin taxes on cigarettes in Korea will increase the number of crimes in Korea.” To explain the logic behind this relationship, we also have researched academic work. The reason we set this hypothesis is that our two previous literature review have suggested that sin taxes make the economy worse. Then our logic is that if we conclude that sin tax is making economy worse, and then by making economy worse sin taxes are increasing the number of crimes.
Therefore, we have researched academic researches between economy and crimes. “Crime and Poverty: Evidence from a Natural Experiment (2002)” shows the relationship between poverty and crime. In this research, they use the data in rural Madagascar (Fafchamps, 2002, p.15) to confirm that “poverty has an effect on crime” (p.13). There result is that “for all crime categories… there is at least one set of regression results showing a positive association between crime and poverty (See Table3)” (p.14), and this means if economy becomes worse, then the crime will rise.
Table3. The result of “Crime and Poverty: Evidence from a Natural Experiment” (p.20)

This result suggests that if ‘sin tax’ makes our economy poorer by spending money in not a cost-effective way, then the crime will rise. Therefore in this respect, we can link ‘sin tax’ and ‘the number of crimes.’
Another academic work “Economic Inequality and the Rise in U.S. Imprisonment (2004)” shows the relationship between “economic inequality” and the crimes by observing the rise in imprisonment in United States. This paper “relates the growth in men’s admission rate to increasing economic inequality through 1980s and 1990s” (p. 1).
According to the article, the analysis has shown that “rising economic inequality is associated with higher rates of imprisonment” (p.28). This result suggests that if ‘sin tax’ makes the gap between the rich and the poor wider, which means increasing economic inequality, then the crime will also rise. In this respect, we can link ‘sin tax’ and ‘the number of crimes’ too.
In summary, in section 2, we concluded that ‘sin tax’ is not a cost-effective way to improve public health, and is widening the gap between the rich and poor. Then in this section, with another two academic work, we concluded that ‘poverty’ and ‘economic inequality’ increase crimes. Thereafter we finally link ‘sin tax’ and ‘crimes’ with all four academic works and this is our logic behind the relationship between ‘sin tax’ and ‘crimes.’ We also have made a diagram to clarify our logic like this:
Figure 1: Our logic
참고문헌
Reference
술ㆍ담뱃값 인상에 4명 중 3명 ‘반대.’ (2009, July 7). Seoul Sin Moon. Retrieved from
http://nownews.seoul.co.kr/

죄악세 도입, 재추진 되나? (2010, April 7). Han Kook Gyungjae. Retrieved from
http://www.hankyung.com/news/

Data from Korea Statstics, Korea Statstics, http://www.kostat.go.kr/

Davis, M. L. et al (2007, June). Taxing the Poor. Dallas, Texas: National Center for Policy
Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.ncpa.org/pub/st/st300

Fafchamps, M. et al. (2002, September). Crime and Poverty: Evidence from a Natural
Experiment. Manor Road, Oxford: University of Oxford.

Gifford, Jr. A. (1998). Whiskey, Margarine, and Newspapers: A Tale of Three Taxes in The
Predatory Politics of Fiscal Discrimination. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Park, J. S. (2009, August 20). 죄악세의 함정. Kyung Hyang Press. Retrieved from
http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=200907131810495&code=990503

Van Ball, P. H. M. et al. (2008, Feburary). Lifetime Medical Costs of Obesity: Prevention No
Cure for Increasing Health Expenditure in Plos Medicine, volume 5, issue 2: e29, 242-249. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050029.

Western, B. et al. (2004, April). Economic Inequality and the Rise in U.S. Imprisonment.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University

오늘 본 자료
더보기
  • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
해당 정보 및 게시물의 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용,무단 전재·배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견 시 고객센터에 신고해 주시기 바랍니다.