소개글
[한국정치론] 지역정치와 한국 민주주의 통합(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
- Introduction
- Regionalism in Korea
- Describing Regionalism: How Much, and When?
- Why Regional Voting Was Muted Before 1987: Voter preferences and Changing Institutions.
- Conclusion: Regionalism and Democratic Consolidation in Korea.
- Is regionalism a positive factor for Korean politics?
- Regionalism is not a negative factor for Korean democracy!
본문내용
He argues that an analysis of results from post-independence Korean elections support the thesis that the regional pattern follows self-interest, not emotional ties. So, we are asking why people have the preferences they do is a different question than asking whether those preferences are expressed through democratic means.
This rest of this chapter is organized in four sections. In the second section, the history of regionalism. In the third sections, regional voting is a post - 1987 phenomenon, using election results from 1948 to 2000. In the fourth section, the rapid shift in voting behavior that emphasizes the electoral connection between voters and leaders. In the final section, the theoretical implications of his argument and look to the future: future directions for Korean democracy, and future directions for its study.
Regionalism in Korea
Name
Year
Cholla
Kyongsang
Kim Dae-Jung
1987
87%
3%
1992
89%
9%
1997
93%
12%
Kim Young-Sam
1987
3%
-
1992
5%
69%
Lee Hoi Chang
1997
-
60%
Regional ties have become a major source of voting behavior for the Korean polity. So, Let's see the table about the three most recent presidential elections.