소개글
[한국정치론] 지역정치와 한국 민주주의 통합(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1.Introduction
2.Regionalism in Korea
3.Regionalism, How much and When?
4.After 1987, Changes
5.Conclusion
본문내용
One major analytic issue that has arisen is the extent to which nascent democracies have actually become consolidated.
Two scholars’ view
What about South Korea?
South Korea is a notable case of a democratic
transition
There is still concern that democracy is not yet
consolidated.
WHY ? The tendency for voting to follow
regional lines
Historical underdevelopment of Cholla in contrast to Kyongsang
Refutation : regional voting in Korea is actually a fairly recent phenomenon since the year 1987 with dramatic political reforms(a direct presidential election and a new constitution).
ex) In 1963, presidential vote, Park – 53% of the Cholla
Yun – 41% of the Cholla
In 1971, national assembly election, the ruling party(DRP) – 53% of the Cholla
the opposition(NKP- led by Kim Dae-Jung) – 41% of the Kyongsang
In 1981, national assembly election, Chun’s ruling party(DJP) – 38% of the Cholla
In 1985, national assembly election, NKDP(Kim Dae-Jung) – 23% of the Cholla ( lower vote share than the ruling DJP)
The biased recruitment of elites and the manipulation of regional sentiment by political elites
Refutation : At that time, Cholla region had historically been agricultural in focus, so, we might expect that fewer elites would come from such a region in any country.
That is, Seoul – capital, Busan – major port
These two provinces were the logical places to emphasize manufacturing and major port facilities.