[리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)

 1  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-1
 2  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-2
 3  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-3
 4  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-4
 5  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-5
 6  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-6
 7  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-7
 8  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-8
 9  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-9
 10  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-10
 11  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-11
 12  [리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)-12
※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.
  • 분야
  • 등록일
  • 페이지/형식
  • 구매가격
  • 적립금
자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
소개글
[리더십] 카리스마 리더십 아돌프 히틀러(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1 BACKGROUND
2 HITLER`s OUTLOOK ON LEADERSHIP
3 CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE
3.1 Demagogue
3.2 Dramatization
3.3 Rhetoric methodology
3.4 Identifying goal of organization
3.5 Confidence in the future & followers
3.6 Dichotomy between ally and enemy
4 LIMITATION
4.1 Distrust in subordinates
4.2 High dependency of subordinates
4.3 Immorality
5 IMPLECATIONS
본문내용
3.4 Identifying goals of organization
Hitler identify and declare their(Germany) organizations vision clearly. Before identifying vision, valuing present situation, predicting future streams and valuing organizations potential should be confirmed first. Hitler also knew this clearly before declare his thought about the vision. Earlier than the time he achieve dictator power, he had inspected present situation and history of Germany. Result of these inspections he could establish the final vision to be taken by Germany and the way(or direction) Germany should go. Abstract vision would be recommended by politicians frequently but Hitler`s one was a different one to Germans in that time period.
In valuing present situation, he scratched an itching spot, not only economic problems but also hurt Germans confidence many Germans had. Furthermore he blamed the enemies about reasons that pushed Germany to that situation. Many people had satisfaction in this point of view and became enthusiastic supporter of Hitler.
In suggestion about the “way to achieve” He also suggested a clear and cool way to be performed. He suggested some specific methods in walking in that way. And the methods are attractive. Because the method which suggested by Hitler gave a way to release their negative emotions, hatred of enemy, dissatisfaction, frustration , to the people.
He also doesn`t drop the past story. He reminded the brilliant German history of the past. And he aroused wills to achieve brilliant nation again between the people.
3.5 Confidence in the future & followers
Hitler`s confidence in the future and followers ability is clearly revealed in following his mention. “ Germans is receiving a raw deal in international world. But Aryans is the most outstanding people in the world. We have to unite behind our ethnic community to show our power to other nations. It seems like an attempt to achieve pygmalion effect.
His viewpoint of history was a heroism. He attempted to reestablishment in German history. Like some hero in history that Arminus who defeated Roman fleet, Friedrich Barbarossa the king of the holy roman empire, Friedrich I the emperor of the holy roman empire, Hitler wanted to be the next German hero in that situation.
3.6 Dichotomy between ally and enemy
To achieve collective efficacy, Hitler used a powerful method of dichotomy. Regardless of his true thinking of the enemy of Germany, he pointed out some enemies. He once said that “We should make our enemy which can be watched clearly, be touched by hand.” According to Bertland Russell, no one could be happy without hatred to other nation, other ideology and other people. Hitler provided the enemies which can be accounted for their frustration and failure to his followers. Thereby followers blame the enemies freely and through this way, they could be confident on their potential and excellence.
Many of his speeches are long diatribes of hate – against the Jews, against the Marxists, against the Czechs, the Poles, and the French. Especially Jews have a lot of portion of wealth in Germany at that time, Aryans who suffered from economic recession or have no work became anti to Jews easily. Also he had a particularly venomous contempt for the intellectuals and the educated middle-classes.