대학성과평가 다변량분석

 1  대학성과평가 다변량분석-1
 2  대학성과평가 다변량분석-2
 3  대학성과평가 다변량분석-3
 4  대학성과평가 다변량분석-4
 5  대학성과평가 다변량분석-5
 6  대학성과평가 다변량분석-6
 7  대학성과평가 다변량분석-7
 8  대학성과평가 다변량분석-8
 9  대학성과평가 다변량분석-9
 10  대학성과평가 다변량분석-10
 11  대학성과평가 다변량분석-11
 12  대학성과평가 다변량분석-12
※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.
  • 분야
  • 등록일
  • 페이지/형식
  • 구매가격
  • 적립금
자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
소개글
대학성과평가 다변량분석에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Data set
2-1. Data explanation
2-2. Introduction of variable
3. Analysis
3-1. Method of analysis
3-2. Basic assumptions of the discriminant analysis
3-3. Linear discriminant function
3-4. Analysis of quadratic discriminant function (main)
4. Comparing
4-1. comparison between an evaluation of the ministry of education and discriminant analysis
4-2. Misclassified observation
4-3. Examples of Misclassified observation
5. Conclusion
6. Reference
본문내용
1. Introduction
In Aug. 2012, Korean government presented a list of universities with poor performance. If a university is selected as a poor performance university, the government will stop giving financial support to the university. Also, students in the universities will not be able to get national scholarship from the government. The government evaluated all the universities in Korea according to its criteria and universities that scored less than 15% from the poorest were selected as poor performance universities. As a result, some universities were selected as poor performance universities.
However, the list caused a lot of controversy about the criteria of selection. People wondered how the government selected poor performance universities. That is why we wanted to check logical validity of government’s list.
To confirm whether the list the government presented is reliable or not, we collected data about some features of private universities in Korea. The features are supplement rate of new students, supplement rate of enrolled students, employment rate, rate of corporate transferred property, rate of legal burden charge, dependence rate of tuition, property, financial aid per a student, school dropout rate, research allowances per a full-time instructor and teaching rate of irregular instructor. After that, we did multivariate analysis by using discriminant analysis.
The aim of this study is to verify whether the government chose poor performance universities in a reasonable way or not. We will do that by doing discriminant analysis and comparing the results against those of the government’s list. In that way, we would like to explore the data and investigate validity of the government’s list.
오늘 본 자료
더보기
  • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
해당 정보 및 게시물의 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용,무단 전재·배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견 시 고객센터에 신고해 주시기 바랍니다.