추천자료
공학교육인증사이트 활성화를 위한 방안
대학도서관 서비스-Perspectives on User Satisfaction Surveys
[기업 예측][기업][기업 부실예측][기업 도산예측][기업 이익예측][기업 원가예측][부실][도산][이익][원가]기업 부실예측, 기업 도산예측, 기업 이익예측, 기업 원가예측 분석(기업 예측, 기업, 기업 부실예측)
[신용평가기관][신용평가기관 신용등급][신용평가기관 기업설명회 활동]신용평가기관의 중요성, 신용평가기관의 규정, 신용평가기관의 선행연구, 신용평가기관의 신용등급, 신용평가기관의 IR(기업설명회)활동
[한국경제] 기업지배구조가 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향
사회복지조사론] 사회복지 실천에서 과학적 방법이 필요한 이유에 대해 논하시오
[품질측정][고객만족][대학도서관][공공서비스][서비스고객][서비스잠재력]고객만족의 품질측정, 대학도서관의 품질측정, 공공서비스의 품질측정, 서비스고객의 품질측정, 서비스잠재력의 품질측정, 제언 분석
[사회복지정책론] 사회민주주의 이론의 개념과 핵심내용, 복지정책에 기여한 면과 장점과 단
[관광산업]중국 관광과 그 영향(한국인 유치)전략
[금융기관경영론] 금융기업의 리스크관리 현황과 바람직한 방향 - 대구은행의 리스크관리
소개글
대학성과평가 다변량분석에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Data set
2-1. Data explanation
2-2. Introduction of variable
3. Analysis
3-1. Method of analysis
3-2. Basic assumptions of the discriminant analysis
3-3. Linear discriminant function
3-4. Analysis of quadratic discriminant function (main)
4. Comparing
4-1. comparison between an evaluation of the ministry of education and discriminant analysis
4-2. Misclassified observation
4-3. Examples of Misclassified observation
5. Conclusion
6. Reference
본문내용
1. Introduction
In Aug. 2012, Korean government presented a list of universities with poor performance. If a university is selected as a poor performance university, the government will stop giving financial support to the university. Also, students in the universities will not be able to get national scholarship from the government. The government evaluated all the universities in Korea according to its criteria and universities that scored less than 15% from the poorest were selected as poor performance universities. As a result, some universities were selected as poor performance universities.
However, the list caused a lot of controversy about the criteria of selection. People wondered how the government selected poor performance universities. That is why we wanted to check logical validity of government’s list.
To confirm whether the list the government presented is reliable or not, we collected data about some features of private universities in Korea. The features are supplement rate of new students, supplement rate of enrolled students, employment rate, rate of corporate transferred property, rate of legal burden charge, dependence rate of tuition, property, financial aid per a student, school dropout rate, research allowances per a full-time instructor and teaching rate of irregular instructor. After that, we did multivariate analysis by using discriminant analysis.
The aim of this study is to verify whether the government chose poor performance universities in a reasonable way or not. We will do that by doing discriminant analysis and comparing the results against those of the government’s list. In that way, we would like to explore the data and investigate validity of the government’s list.