| |
| 영문초록 |
| This article deals with the question in Roman law of whether or not the employer was obligated to pay the remuneration (wage), when the employee was hindered from offering his labor by an event not attributable to both of them. It is hard to answer this question of risk distribution between the parties in the Roman law of labor contract, because there is only a very limited number of legal sources available. A critical survey of these sources, esp. D.19.2.19.8-10 (Ulp. 32 ed.) and FIRA III, No.150 a-c (CIL III, 948-949 Tab. IX-XI), reveals no certain legal guideline in theory and practice. The latter shows but a spectrum of practical solutions by way of conventional agreements between the parties, and the former sanctions according to the general principles of contract law, because the case it deals with concerns a situation not of risk distribution, but of a fault to be blamed to one of the parties. The picture we have shows a settled contract of labor freely stipulated by the parties. However, we also find a series of legal decisions securing laborers working conditions tolerable and humane as are necessary for their health and aliment (Alf. D.38.1.26; Ner. D.38.1.50.1; Iav. D.38.1.33; Gai. D.38.1.19; Paul. D.38.1.20.pr; Gai. D.38.1.22.2; Paul. D.38.1.16.1). It is, therefore, worthy to emphasize on the two competing ideas of labor contract among the Roman jurists. The veteres, the Republican jurists succeeded by the Sabinians in the classical period, deemed it as a status contract to the effect that it might encompass protective measures for the working persons (that means practically "Payment in spite of no labor"), whereas the proponents of the New Jurisprudence, of which the originator was Servius Sulpicius Rufus and which was followed by the Proculians in the classical period, took for granted its being a free transaction between the parties (they tended to recognize "No payment without labor"). The sources we have analysed reflect the typical law of the classical period in which the Proculian idea prevailed. |
| |
| |
계약의 신의, 고용계약, 고용주의 사망, 노동, 다키아 서판, 로마법, 무노동 무임금, 보수 청구, 사변, 위험부담, 임약(賃約), 피용자의 병환, 피용자의 사망, Labor contract, Locatio conductio operarum, no payment without Labor? Roman Law, wage |
| |
| |
| 도움말 |
| 본 논문은 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다. |
| |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 저작권 정보 |
|
| 본 학술논문은 한국학술정보㈜ 각 학회간에 저작권 계약이 체결된 것으로 HAPPY학술이 제공하고 있습니다. 본 저작물을 불법적으로 이용시는 법적인 제재가 가해질 수 있습니다. |
|
|
|
분야
0x701664.pdf 
