Articles : Trade secrets and trade secrets: protection sans ``property rights`` concept
사회과학 > 법학
( Tania Sebastian )
고려대학교 법학연구원
Korea University Law Review 2012년, 제11권 139~149쪽(총11쪽)
1f501215.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    123원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    It is said that one of the reason scholars debate whether trade secret law reflects property rights is that trade secret law itself does not provide a definitive answer, This, bundled with contrasting judicial interpretations on whether trade secrets are actually reflective of property or not, have constituted a perennial debate, Subsequently, there was a felt need to erase the ``property concept`` from trade secrets. Is this stance rational? The arguments of the following paper seek to address this concern and hence take the following form. Part 1 introduces the accepted definitions of trade secret. Part 2 deals with the courts outlook towards the property paradigm in trade secrets. Part 3 elucidates the support of the courts in interpreting trade secrets as property rights, over and above the employee-employer relationship. Part 4 contrasts Part 3; thereby stating that the property defence to protect trade secret is a misnomer. Part 5 concludes the article on the evergreen debate of whether trade secrets are property or not and supports the facet that trade secrets should not be protected as stringently as property rights.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.