레비나스의 철학 해체와 타자 개념에 대한 일고(一考): 대인(對人)윤리의 관점에서
분야
인문과학 > 기타(인문과학)
저자
박치완 ( Tchi Wan Park )
발행기관
한국해석학회
간행물정보
해석학연구 2012년, 제30권 183~227페이지(총45페이지)
파일형식
0z100405.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    12,000원
    적립금
    360원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    영문초록
    Levinas`s philosophy is generally regarded as ethics. However, one wonders whether his so-called ``ethical turn`` is meaningful in solving ethical problems in the real world. In this article, I argued that the direction of his ethical discourse based on the notion of the absolute other is not towards the ``secular reality`` but towards the ``ethical ideal``, I suspect that this is the reason why J, Derrida, whose thought is arguably the closest to that of Levinas, analysed Levinas`s theory of the other as ``thought separate from ethics``. In a similar vein, P. Ricoeur asserts that Levinas`s ethics of the other is ``simply an extension of ontology``. Moreover, B. Taurek and R. Rorty claim that ``ethics is impossible`` for Levinas. The root of the problem that caused these critiques can be found in Levinas`s thought system. In particular, his theory of the other, which he proposed as the result of the deconstruction of ``being`` and ``totality``, does not aim to be genuine consideration about the ``general other`` or the ``alienated others``, but merely aims to be theological ethics about the absolute other. This is why his ethics, which is not human-centered but god-centered, takes human ``hostage``.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.