문학 : 도스토예프스키의 “지하생활자”와 신경과학자
분야
어문학 > 노어노문
저자
석영중
발행기관
한국러시아문학회
간행물정보
러시아어문학연구논집 2012년, 제41권 29~50쪽(총22쪽)
파일형식
26600981.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    5,200원
    적립금
    156원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    영문초록
    This paper is focused on the dilemma of free will as it is interpreted by Dostoevsky and Neuroscience. Dostoevsky`s novel Notes from Underground has been regarded as an explicit polemic with Chernyshevsky`s rationalism and determinism. Dostoevsky`s polemic against determinism foreshadows today`s free will debate in neuroscience in that Dostoevsky`s Underground Man thinks that man has free will and he can do anything against his own benefit just in order to prove that he is free and he is not regulated by the law of nature. However, in actuality his life proceeds as if he is guided by some invisible power and all his effort to prove the existence of free will ends up with total mental bankruptcy. Similarly, today`s neuroscientists like to assert that there is no free will, but their assertion is far from solving the free will debate. The scientist Benjamin Libet showed in an experiment on human consciousness that unconscious processes in the brain precedes the initiation of conscious action based on free will. If this is true, there arises the problem of responsibility. If human condition is genetically determined, no one is responsible for anything. For this reason, many neuroscientists are still in some midway between determinism and free will in spite of Libet experiment.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.