에밀 브루너(Emil Brunner)와 칼 바르트(Karl Barth)의 자연신학 논쟁 -삼위일체론적 계시 이해를 위하여
분야
인문과학 > 종교학
저자
오승성 ( Seung Sung Oh )
발행기관
한국기독교학회
간행물정보
한국기독교신학논총 2012년, 제82권 177~202쪽(총26쪽)
파일형식
89201247.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    5,600원
    적립금
    168원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    영문초록
    According to Karl Barth, God can not be grasped by epistemological categories of human beings, because God is the wholly Other. God is done by the sola gratia. For Barth, natural theology which is possible by the analogia entis is impossible because of the radical corruption of human beings. What we need is the analogia fidei in order to acquire a knowledge of God. However, Emil Brunner`s understanding of revelation is different from Barth`s. Brunner admits a fundamental significance of general revelation in his dialectics. It becomes a presupposition of special revelation in the formal aspect of Imago Dei which signifies universal characteristics of human beings which separate them from other creatures. But, Brunner`s acceptance of general revelation is passive. Like Barth, he also admits only the sola gratia. In Barth`s view, Brunner`s thinking is in danger of falling into natural theology, because the formal image slips into the material. We can hold the Reformed principle of the sola gratia admitting an epistemological effect of general revelation, insofar as revelation is grasped within the Trinitarian point of view. The Trinitarian point of view should be accepted in all spheres of theology.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.