재판청구권과 법원의 논증의무 -대법원 2010. 6. 24. 선고 2010도3358 판결을 중심으로-
분야
사회과학 > 법학
저자
박준석 ( Joon Seok Park )
발행기관
단국대학교 법학연구소
간행물정보
법학논총 2012년, 제36권 제2호, 185~207페이지(총23페이지)
파일형식
62700980.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    6,300원
    적립금
    189원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    영문초록
    This paper attempts to grasp the meaning of the Article 27 (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea which provides that "All citizens shall have the right to trial in conformity with the Act by judges qualified under the Constitution and the Act." Many scholars have scrutinized the meaning of the provision, but the meaning of the concept of "right to trial" itself has never been fully shed in the light of legal interpretation and argumentation. It goes through different path from what has been suggested either by theories of legal argumentation or legal reasoning, or by theories concerning the meaning of rule of law in that it pursues what J. Waldron calls right-based arguments rather than duty-based or aim-based arguments. It concludes that the right to trial is not just a right to the conclusive directives by which our behavior shall be guided, but also a right for the reason be given. To put it in a different word, the right to trial is a right to nonarbitrary judgment in public decision making, especially in the court`s decisions.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.