WTO 서비스무역 분쟁사례 연구 -미국 인터넷도박 사례-
사회과학 > 법학
손기윤 ( Ki Youn Sohn )
단국대학교 법학연구소
법학논총 2012년, 제36권 제2호, 909~927페이지(총19페이지)
62701006.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    177원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    We analyze important issues raised in the US-Gambling case. The issues include how to interpret specific commitments, the scope of GATS Article XVI and application of the general exceptions rule, Article XIV. Panel ruled that the U.S. made specific commitment for gambling and betting services and that the U.S. measures are not justified under GATS Article XIV. The Appellate Body upheld Penal`s finding concerning specific commitment. The Appellate Body also upheld the Panel`s finding that the U.S. measures are designed to protect public morals or to maintain public order. The Appellate Body reversed the Panel`s conclusion on necessity for Article XIV(a), but it concluded that the measures at issue are necessary under the Article on different ground. Then, assessing the rulings by Panel and Appellate Body, we raise a question on the Appellate Body`s conclusion on the nature of W/120 and 1993 Scheduling Guidelines and discuss the scope of GATS Article XVI and the potential undermining of WTO Members` regulatory autonomy.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.