근대계몽기 문학교육의 형성과 흔적 : 근대계몽기 문학과 무학교육
분야
어문학 > 기타제어문
저자
정호웅 ( Ho Ung Jung )
발행기관
한국문학교육학회
간행물정보
문학교육학 2012년, 제39권 9~32페이지(총24페이지)
파일형식
85200646.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    6,400원
    적립금
    192원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    영문초록
    The objective of this article is to verify how literature ofmodem enlightenment period can be applied in the field of literature education, based on examination on the form of enlightenment and enlightenmentity which are the core character of literature in modern enlightenment period and on examination on the characteristics of literature in modern enlightenment period as the literature in transition period. modem enlightenment period was a period of enlightenment and this made the form of enlightenment as the basic form of the literature in that period narrative literature in modem enlightenment period can be divided into four categories amoebaean style, debating style, orating style and describing style of literature in modern enlightenment period, discuss about subjects which already have their answers, therefore those are closed forms debating style of the modern enlightenment period is about how people reaches to answer by debating, but about how people confirm the already chosen answer. In this sense, debating style of literature in modern enlightenment period also was closed form ``structure of relationship of teacher and studenk``, which is the basic form of [무정], is a collection of those closed discusses. These kinds of closed forms blocks the subjects from self reflection from the beginning Narrative literature in modem enlightenment period be divided into four categories amoebaean style, debating style, orating style and describing style by style of discuss amobaean style and orating style, which are characteristic style of literature in modern enlightenment period, discuss about subjects which already have their answers, therefore those are closed forms. Debating style of the modern enlightenment period is not about how people reaches to the answer by debating, but about how people confirm the already chosen answer. In this sense, debating style of literature in modem enlightenment period also was closed form . ``structure of relationship of teachr and student``, which is the basic form of [무정], is a collection of those dosed discusses. On the basement of the literature in modern enlightenment period was the dichotomy. this dichotomy divides "pre modernity/modernity" and also divides ``nihilation of the past/for take of the future``. These kinds of dichotomy is closely connected to the fact that the heroes of ``혈의 누``and ``무정`` are orphans. Authors lived modern enlightenment period saw the world through the window of dichotomy, dividing ``pre modernity/modernity`` and dividing ``nihilation of the past/for take of the future``. And made their opinions in accordance with dichotomy, "those kinds of dichotomy codes like beauty/ugly, truth/false, good/evil was, in some sense, a tool to express creativity" and in the other sense it was aresult of despair from the fact that people of modem enlightenment period could not find any lesson or legacy from the past and the older generation. As we far examined, literature in modem enlightenment period can be understood in several ways. By applying what we have examined literature education can be mote intensified and extended.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.