협상에 의한 민사분쟁의 해결 -화해 소송의 의사결정과정-
분야
사회과학 > 법학
저자
김정환 ( Jung Hwan Kim )
발행기관
안암법학회
간행물정보
안암법학 2013년, 제40권 231~259페이지(총29페이지)
파일형식
22001616.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    6,900원
    적립금
    207원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    영문초록
    In civil disputes, the parties can reach resolution by any of the following four means: litigation, negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. The last three are known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) among which negotiation is the most common way of resolution. When deciding the resolution method, the parties will first analyze possible gain and loss that can be incurred from each method. This decision making process is known as "Case Valuation". Conventional rational choice theory has explained the process of case valuation based on the premise that the parties will make rational choice. However, based on its recent findings, contemporary cognitive psychology challenges the rationality premise and argues that human behavior during case valuation may not be rational. This study first reviews decision-making process based on rational choice theory, then considers various factors that may interfere with rational decision-making process. Lastly, the study debates whether a decision-making model based on rational choice theory can no longer serve as a reliable and accurate model to explain the decisions made by the parties during case valuation.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.