드롭 착지와 착지 후 점프 시 충격흡수 기전의 차이 분석
분야
예체능 > 체육학
저자
조준행 ( Joon Haeng Cho ) , 김경훈 ( Kyoung Hun Kim ) , 고영철 ( Yong Chul Koh )
발행기관
한국운동역학회
간행물정보
한국운동역학회지 2012년, 제22권 제4호, 379~386페이지(총8페이지)
파일형식
0k401452.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    4,500원
    적립금
    135원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    국문초록
    The aim of this study was to investigate and identify the differences in lower extremity energy dissipation strategies between drop-landing and countermovement-jump maneuvers. Fourteen recreational athletes(Age : 32.3±3.1 years, Height : 172.3±4.0 cm, Weight : 69.2±4.7 kg) were recruited and instructed to perform drop-landing from 45 cm height and countermovement-jump from 45 cm to 20 cm Height. The landing phase was taken as the time between initial contact and peak knee flexion. A motion-capture system consisting of eight infra-red cameras was employed to collect kinematics data at a sampling rate of 200 Hz and a force-plate was used to collect GRF date at a sampling rate of 200 Hz. Paired t-test was performed to determine the difference in kinematics and kinetics variables between each task. During the countermovement-jump task, all of lower extremity joint ROM and the hip joint eccentric moment were decreased and the ankle joint plantarflexion moment was increased than drop-landing task. In the eccentric work during countermovement-jump task, the ankle joint displayed greater while knee and hip joint showed lesser than drop-landing. Therefore, the knee joint acted as the key energy dissipater during drop-landing while the ankle the ankle joint contributed the most energy dissipation during countermovement-jump. Our findings collectively indicated that different energy dissipation strategies were adopted for drop-landing and countermovement-jump.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.