교과서제도(敎科書制度)에 대한 헌법재판소(憲法裁判所)와 법원(法院)의 판례분석(判例分析) -교과서제도(敎科書制度)의 발전을 위한 시사점(市唆點)과 비판(批判)-
분야
사회과학 > 법학
저자
김유환 ( Yoo Hwan Kim )
발행기관
이화여자대학교 법학연구소
간행물정보
법학논집 2002년, 제7권 제1호, 101~116페이지(총16페이지)
파일형식
2b600345.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    5,600원
    적립금
    168원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    영문초록
    Despite the apparent pro status quo arguments presented in the decisions of Korean judicial courts and the Korean Constitutional Court, their reasoning reveals different aspects of their real opinions. Even though the prevailing opinions of the courts confirm the legality of current regulatory system, I believe, most judges of the courts hoped to reform the current textbook regulations. I have found a number of useful reformative arguments from the reasoning of their decisions. From these arguments, I probed the possible reformative model of the textbook regulation system. First, the textbook adoption system must be regulated not by a Presidential decree but by a Statute enacted by the National Congress. Second, the National publication system of school textbooks must be abolished. Third, participatory rights of the parents should be enhanced, so much so that they can take part in selecting the textbooks. Fourth, procedural regulations should be introduced to the current textbook adoption process to restrict the discretionary power of the Textbook Adoption Committee and the other relevant administrative agencies. Fifth, In order to facilitate the judicial review for cultural diversity, the statutory clauses that provide guarantee against political and philosophical monopoly of the prevailing group should be created by National Congress.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.