A Comparison between the International and United States Funds for Oil Pollution Compensation
사회과학 > 법학
( In Ho Kim )
이화여자대학교 법학연구소
법학논집 2003년, 제7권 제2호, 187~200페이지(총14페이지)
2b600361.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    162원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    Many nations agreed to a global system consisting of the international conventions for oil spill liability and compensation. On the other hand, a concern about the adequacy of the international regime induced the U.S. to take a unilateral approach instead of joining the international regime. With significant differences in detail, both regime share a structure based on the same basic principles. Both regimes have a two tier structure that is composed of a liability scheme and a fund scheme. Each regime imposes liability on the shipping sector based on the principle that the polluter pays. In addition, each regime establishes a fund financed by levies imposed on shipped oil to supplement the primary liability scheme. The disparities between the international and U.S. regimes in the function of funds will be reviewed as a premise for discussion of feasibility of a unified international regime. The peculiarities recealed in the process of nationalization of the international regime can be interpreted as a limitation of harmonizing the regimes. On the other hand, they can make it easier to formulate a unified international regime by differentiating national regimes. The review of advantages and disadvantages in each regime implies what a new unified international regime should be.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.