Classifiers and Plural Marking are Not Mutually Exclusive
어문학 > 언어학
( Chong Hyuck Kim )
언어학 2013년, 제21권 제1호, 29~45페이지(총17페이지)
58800981.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    171원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 21(1), 29-45. Chierchia(1998) develops an influential semantic theory called Nominal Mappong Parameter, which predicts that a language with a generalized classifier system does not have plural making. He claims that common nouns in classifier languages do not differentiate singular entities from plural entities in the syntax just like English mass nouns and, as such, they are bound to have obligatory classifier systems and no plural making. In this article, I argue against Cheirchia`s view and claim that a generalized classifier system in a language should not be taken to show that the language has a mass lexicon. My argument is based on data drawn from Korean in which a generalized classifer system coexists with fairly productive plural marking.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.