영문초록
The purpose of this paper is to make a critical review on Cheong Yakyong`s Yaobian theory expressed in his Complementary Commentary on the Official Divinatory Records of the Spring and Autumn Period(春秋官占補註). Cheong Yakyong draw two conclusions from this Complementary Commentary on the Official Divinatory Records of the Spring and Autumn Period(春秋官占補註), First is a “Yiyaobian(一爻變)”, Second is a “Benguaweizhu(本卦爲主)”. “Yiyaobian” is not a traditional concept, so author raise two questions in this paper. One Question is this: How do we understand “Qianzhibi(乾 之 否)`s divinatory record of the Official Divinatory Records of the Spring and Autumn Period. According to Tasan`s opinion, this divinatory record is not belong to the divinatory rule of the Zhouyi, this should be counted as belonging to the divinatory rule of the Lianshan and Guicang. But With regard to this opinion, Tasan did not provide a reasonable explanation. The other Question is this: How do we understand Zhongfangding(中方鼎)`s inscription, which was proved to be excavated materials of the Western Zhou(西周) period. According to Li Xueqin`s opinion, Zhongfangding`s inscription was the proof of “Duoyaobian(多爻變)”. “Benguaweizhou” of the Yaobian theory was a dominant view in the History of Chinese Yi Studies. But Unlike Complementary Commentary on the Official Divinatory Records of the Spring and Autumn Period(春秋官占補註), Cheong Yakyong insisted on “Zhiguaweizhu(之卦爲主)” in his representative work Zhouyisijian(周易四箋). “Zhiguaweizhu” must be a new interpretation of the Yaobian theory, but Tasan did not offer adequate grounds for this opinion.
분야
46800304.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
