폴 리쾨르의 상징이론의 관점에서 본 조나단 스미스의 신화이해
분야
인문과학 > 종교학
저자
김여원 ( Young Won Kim )
발행기관
서울대학교 종교문제연구소
간행물정보
종교와 문화 2013년, 제24권 83~104페이지(총22페이지)
파일형식
46800305.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    6,200원
    적립금
    186원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    영문초록
    The purpose of this essay is to analyze and evaluate Jonathan Z. Smith`s theory of myth from the viewpoint of Paul Ricoeur`s hermeneutics of symbol. Ricoeur`s hermeneutics of symbol describes the process of recovering the ontological depth of human beings, which the moderns lost and forgot. The most important step in this process is the stage of corrective critique. In the corrective critique, a subject finds its own illusion, which Ricoeur calls the Cartesian ego. The subject which escaped from this illusion finally sees the structure of his or her own being. Ricoeur shows a concrete picture of the structure of being through analyzing Freud`s psychoanalysis and Hegel`s phenomenology of spirit. The analysis of Freul`s psychoanalysis gives the subject the archaeology of the subject. Hegel`s phenomenology of spirit provides the subject with the teleology of the subject. The dialectic of the archaeology and the teleology reveals the fact that the Cartesian ego exists within the depth of being, not vice versa. Eliade`s phenomenology of religion shows us the dialectic of the sacred and the profane in which the subject realizes its rootedness in the sacred or in the whole. From the viewpoint of the hermeneutics of symbol, myth always functions within a specific symbolism, in which the subject realizes his or her depth of being. Evaluating Smith`s understanding of myth from the perspective of Ricoeur`s hermeneutics of symbol, we can find that Smith`s mythology excludes the ontological function of myth and makes its intellectual and epistemological aspect conspicuous. Beyond the locative would view emphasizing order and conformity and the utopian world view accentuating transcendence and turnover, which Smith learned from Eliade, Smith suggests a new paradigm of his mythology which is based on the perception of incongruity between idealistic world views and realistic situations. In this paradigm, myth is basically understood as an intellectual tool which human beings use to deal with the gap between their own would views and a newly emerging situation in the middle of a social upheaval. However, his understanding myth implies an ontological aspect of myth in the sense that the pieces of myth should go back to the fecundity of sumbols in order to draw new meanings from them, with which they can properly describe the new situations. In this regard, Smith`s mythology is not only a mythology without ontology but also a mythology with a lived ontology.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.