The Korean government enacted the Securities related Class Actions Law in order to seek a relief for collective injuries of investors, caused in the course of unjust trading securities, and to enhance the operational transparency of companies in Korea. However, it is true that when the government first announced the enactment of the Securities Related Class Action Law, many experts worried recklessly extravagant uses of securities class actions. Despite of this worries the Securities Related Class Action Law took in effect in 2005. Historically said that securities class action system was made and developed under the American economic circumstance which is the representative model of the formal capitalism. So Korea is the unique country which introduced the securities class action system to its own financial market among the OECD member countries excluding the U.S. and Canada. In that the Korean government should be very serious and studied many aspects of securities class action in order to make the system of the securities class action just fit to the Korean financial market. However, the Securities Related Class Action Law in Korea is not very fit it-selt to the Korean financial market. Because there are only 5 securities related class actions that have been brought before the court since the enactment of the Securities Related Class Action Law, in spire of the experts worries that the Securities Related Class Action Law would cause recklessly extravagant uses of securities class actions. This Article is basically to examine the present conditions of securities class action in the Korean financial market as well as those in the U.S. financial market. And the Article also introduces the Federal Civil Procedure Rule, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act, Securities Litigation Uniform Standard Act, Sabanes-Oxley Act, and Class Action Fairness Act and studies the current trend of securities class action in the both countries in order to examines the reason why securities related class actions are not in use in Korean financial market. And the Article finally tries to make a proposition for the betterment of the Securities Related Class Action Law.
[민사소송법][민사소송법 당사자][민사소송법 개정][민사소송제도]민사소송법의 당사자, 민사소송법의 개정, 민사소송법과 민사소송제도, 민사소송법과 증권관련집단소송법, 민사소송법과 변호사강제 분석
[법적 고찰][전자상거래]전자상거래의 법적 고찰, 인터넷규제의 법적 고찰, 증권관련집단소송법의 법적 고찰, 안전색의 법적 고찰, 해외동포지원의 법적 고찰, 시민단체의 법적 고찰, 제주도4.3사건의 법적 고찰
[원고적격][원고][소송][원고적격 상실][원고적격 현황][원고적격 사례][향후 원고적격 개선방안]원고적격의 상실, 원고적격의 현황, 원고적격의 사례, 향후 원고적격의 개선방안, 원고적격 관련 제언 분석
부실기재, 부당가압류 손해배상, 수혈 에이즈(AIDS 후천성면역결핍증)감염, 초상권침해 손해배상, 생명침해 공동불법행위, 증권집단소송 손해배상, 국제유류오염, 노동분쟁 가압류범위, 삼풍백화점 손해배상 분석
[졸업논문][법학] 증권관련집단소송에 관한 고찰
[증권관련집단소송제]증권관련 집단소송(증권관련집단소송제)의 개념, 필요성, 절차, 증권관련 집단소송(증권관련집단소송제)과 집단소송법, 보상제도, 증권관련 집단소송(증권관련집단소송제)과 남소방지, 허위공시
[허위공시][허위공시와 공시행위][허위공시와 주주허위공시][허위납입주식][증권집단소송법]허위공시와 공시행위, 허위공시와 주주허위공시, 허위공시와 허위납입주식, 허위공시와 증권집단소송법 분석