북한의 ‘4대 강군화 노선’ 연구: 중국과의 비교와 함의
분야
사회과학 > 정치/외교학
저자
김성주
발행기관
한국국방연구원
간행물정보
국방정책연구 2020년, 제129권 139~172페이지(총34페이지)
파일형식
2p802047.pdf [무료 PDF 뷰어 다운로드]
  • ※ 본 자료는 참고용 논문으로 수정 및 텍스트 복사가 되지 않습니다.
  • 구매가격
    7,400원
    적립금
    222원 (구매자료 3% 적립)
    이메일 발송  스크랩 하기
    자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
    영문초록
    Nuclear weapons do not have the same reliability as “All-round sword” that can deter all levels of conflict or provocation. Therefore, nuclear states must seek an appropriate “Mix of forces” of nuclear weapons and conventional forces for their security. And, in this process, “Security environment” and “Resource constraints” function as important variables. In the 1980s, China implemented a policy that prioritized economic construction in the construction of military forces while pushing for reform and opening. Then, after economic growth reached a certain level, it pursued full-fledged conventional military buildup. On the other hand, North Korea, under the reign of Kim Jong Un has been pursuing a strategy to concentrate all its energy on economic construction since possessing nuclear weapons, but rather is pursuing a policy to strengthen its conventional military power called the “Four powerful military lines.” This is because North Korea’s military policy is continuing with the strategic goal of “Changing the status quo” and controlling the reduction of its military armaments.
    사업자등록번호 220-87-87785 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.070-8809-9397
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1765호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2009 happynlife. steel All reserved.