|Beginning to take part in April Revolution, 1960, Chungnam University students developed the movement against the Agreement between Korea and Japan that was evaluated as a representative student movement at the time, the condemnation movement of 6 8 corrupt election, anti-3 times constitutional revision movement and school military drill abolition movement. They contributed to the collapse of Lee Seung Man regime in April Revolution, 1960 and exerted themselves in exposing non-democratic elements in schools. The movement against the Agreement between Korea and Japan became the opportunity in which students criticized the national democracy of Park Jeong Hee regime and raised their perception of nationalism. Students tried to criticize and cope with the immorality and antidemocratic nature of regime. Students defined the 6 8 corrupt election in 1967 and 3 times constitutional revision in 1969 as anti-democratic behavior and denounced them, The nature of the students movement in Chungnam University was not much different from that of other universities. The level of perception and the point of aim of the movement leadership as a central university in the region, however, was weak compared to that of universities on similar status in other region, Students, being confined in anti-communism and cold war logic, showed a negative attitude toward the unification movement and innovation movement, regarding them as a leftist movement, They just remained to show a simple perception to the nationalism, They failed to take as initiative role at the regional students movement, the aspect of their movement was kind of weak. This kind of problems happened as external and internal elements were united. External elements that worked were the reaction of the government and schools including the watch and control of students, the blocking and dismissal of demonstration, the order of schools closure and the implementation of early vacation. The weakness of professors who did not play the role as the contemporary high intellectual had also an effect. The internal elements worked more in the shrinkage and inactivity of student movement. Internal elements include the perception of Park Jeong Hee regime, the expectation of Kim Jong-Pil and the frailty of movement capability, Especially there were small meetings and ideological circles that took charge of deepening of the study and recognition of social reality and directing of movement in universities in the other regions where movement was relatively more active, but nothing in Chungnam university. Not only general students but also the leading students of movement were not progressive as much as their conscience developed to the level that went beyond the anti-communism and cold war logic.