[조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)

 1  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-1
 2  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-2
 3  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-3
 4  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-4
 5  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-5
 6  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-6
 7  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-7
 8  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-8
 9  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-9
 10  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-10
 11  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-11
 12  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-12
 13  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-13
 14  [조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)-14
※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.
  • 분야
  • 등록일
  • 페이지/형식
  • 구매가격
  • 적립금
자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
소개글
[조직] 담배회사의 생존전략(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction


Ⅱ. General Overview on Tobacco Industry and BAT

1. Why Tobacco Industry Is So Unique?
2. What We’re going to see from BAT’s case
3. BAT’s Social Report

Ⅲ. Two Views on BAT’s Strategy

1. Rational Perspective View

1) Material-resource Environment
2) Social Report as Brand Stretching
3) Effect of Brand Stretching
4) Future developments

2. Natural(Institutional) Perspective View

1) Institutional foundations of Material-resource Environment
2) Institutional Environment
3) Social Report as a way to gain legitimacy from the society


Ⅳ. Consequence
본문내용
What’s the main driving force behind human being’s decision? In other words, what really motivates a person to act in that way? For instance, suppose you started a certain company and soon you’ll be finding yourself putting together a bunch of departments and naming them as marketing department, sales department, public relations department, finance department and so on, without even thinking twice.

Now it gives us a wonder – why do we do that? 1) Because we really need to set up each department’s existence and tasks like that, to work more efficiently? Or 2) just because other companies are also doing that and we don’t want to distant ourselves too far from them? Then we get two opposing arguments – one is claming that a human being’s act is mainly based on economic purposes, another is claming that major portion of human being’s act is based upon not-so-rational intangibility, rather so called bounded-rationality that sociologist cover to be institutional.