[국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics

 1  [국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics-1
 2  [국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics-2
 3  [국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics-3
 4  [국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics-4
 5  [국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics-5
 6  [국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics-6
 7  [국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics-7
 8  [국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics-8
 9  [국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics-9
 10  [국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics-10
※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.
  • 분야
  • 등록일
  • 페이지/형식
  • 구매가격
  • 적립금
자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
소개글
[국제정치, World Politics,] Humanitarian Intervention(인도주의적 개입) -World Politics에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
This essay is to answer whether the theory and practice of humanitarian intervention represent progress in world politics
본문내용
Non-intervention is a norm in international society. It is illegal under the UN charter 2:4 article for states to intervene in other states’ internal affairs. However, humanitarian intervention is an exception to this and has been frequently used to justify states’ acts in intervening other states’ affairs since the Second World War. Humanitarian intervention is an act that allows interfering in the domestic affairs of another state when citizen’s lives are at stake due to actions by their government. Supporters of humanitarian intervention argue that it is legal and legitimate, referring to the UN charter 2:7 article. The idea of humanitarian intervention is contested because of its links to the principles of sovereignty, non-intervention and non-use of force. Humanitarian intervention poses its test for justification.
.
.
.
.
.
A clear definition of humanitarian intervention remains puzzling. Wheeler said “the society of states has committed itself to a human rights culture which outlaws genocide, torture and massive human rights abuse, but those principles of humanitarianism can and do conflict with principles of sovereignty and non-intervention” (Wheeler, p 471).
.
.
.
참고문헌
Belloni Roberto, Kosovo and Beyond: Is Humanitarian. Intervention Transforming International. Society?, http://www.du.edu/gsis/hrhw/volumes/2002/2-1/belloni2-1.pdf
, 30 Dec, 2005

Bull, Hedley, 1988, The Anarchical Society, A Study of Order in World Politics, Macmillan Education LTD:London

Booth Ken, 2001, The Kosovo Tragedy,Frank:London

Burton, John. W. 1972, World Society Ch 10. Conflict. Cambridge:Cambridge

Freedman, Lawrence, ‘Victims and Victors:Reflections on the Kosovo War’ Review of International Studies, 26 (2000), p 335- 358.

Hoffman, Stanley, 1983, Duties beyond borders, mainly Ch. 2 the use of force and ch 3 the promotion of human rights. Syracuse:New York

Latawski, Paul. and Badsey Stephen, 2004, Britain, NATO and the lessons of the Balkan Conflicts 1991-1999, Ch. 8. Nato’s Military Action Over Kosovo by Latawski, Paul. Frank Class:London

Nye, Joseph S. Ch. 6 Intervention, Institutions, and Regional Conflicts in Understanding international conflicts: a
하고 싶은 말
지금까지 제출한 에세이중에서 최고점수 받았던 에세이입니다.
오늘 본 자료
더보기
  • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
해당 정보 및 게시물의 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용,무단 전재·배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견 시 고객센터에 신고해 주시기 바랍니다.