분야
hwpⅠ서론
1. Zero Tolerance 논제 제기
2. Zero Tolerance 정의 및 요약
Ⅱ. 체벌과 훈육 이론적 배경
1. 체벌
1.1 학교 폭력 행동을 야기하는 요인들
1.2 비행 발생의 예
1.3 올바른 체벌의 필요성
2. 훈육의 사례
2.1 외국
2.2 우리나라
3. 체벌과 훈육의 차이와 지향점
3.1 적극적 훈육 소극적 훈육
3.2 대안책 예시
Ⅲ.결론
대안책 방향 (우리나라 현황에 맞춘 구체적 실천모형제시)
Ⅰ서론
1. Zero Tolerance 논제 제기
- Zero Tolerance : The School Woodshed
A 1st grader is disciplined for "sexual harassment" after smacking a classmate's bottom on the playground and the police are called in ; a high school student is expelled after abutter knife briught to school accidentally falls out of her locker ; a 17-year-old is arrested and expelled for shooring a paper clip with a rubber band....
Few polices in education have proven to be as universally ineffective-even counterproductive-as "zero tolerance". Brought to prominence in 1994 when Congress weapons-based school violence and drug problems, zero tolerance edicts have become the virtual woodshed of school discipline : They aresolely punitive, and lack any positive connection to school's primary purpose - learning and development.
Despite the zero-tolerance concept's short-comings, however, states and school districts have extended its reach beyond weapons and drugs, to include an array of behaviors, such as sexual harassment, bullying, and dress-code violations. School officials have been responding to legitimate concerns over tragedies such as the Colimbine High School shootings, and to increases in youth violence generally. And they have raised the zero-tolerance banner in part as a shield against potential liability.
But far from achieving their intended goal of improved behavior and safety, schools are now struggling with the unintended onsequences of applying such draconian discipline so broadly.Press reports regularly focus on the absurd extremes to which zero tolerance can be stretched. But a deeper, more pervasive problem lies in the consequent increase in negative outcomes plaguing most schools today.
According to reports from groups such as the American Bar Association and the American Psychological Association, zero-tolerance policies are associated with declines in academic achievement and increases in student misconduct, school dropouts, and poor attitudes toward adults. Research also links zero tolerance to a dramatic rise in suspensions and expulsions and to more frequent referrals to the juvenile-justice system for infractions once handled in schools.
Although the policy has been presented as a way to improve school climate, its byproduct of higher rates of suspension and expulsion is associated with less satisfactory ratings of climate and disproportionately greater time spent by schools on disciplinary matters.
- 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
- 유아의 성역할 고정관념에 대한 정의를 기술하고 유아가 성역할에 대해 유연한 사고를 할 수 있도록 보육교사로서 어떻게 지원
- [중장년기] 샌드위치세대로서의 중장년기 부모가 경험하는 역할부담
- 전지구적 세계화가 심화되면서 오히려 민주주의가 심각한 위기에 직면하고 있다 교재 3장과 여러 자료를 참고하여 현재 민주주의의 위기를 묘사하고, 민주주의를 위기에서 구할 수 있는 개인적 또는 집단적 대안에 대해 고민하고 서술하시오
- 우리나라 무역의 역할과 위상, 한국무역 성장과정 분석
- 미래해양 및 선박(전기추진, 자율운항 등)의 개발 및 운용에 있어서 기관학(다양한 엔지니어링 기술)의 중요성 및 역할에 관하에 구체적으로 논하시오
해당 정보 및 게시물의 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용,무단 전재·배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견 시 고객센터에 신고해 주시기 바랍니다.
