![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-1](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0001.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-2](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0002.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-3](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0003.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-4](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0004.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-5](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0005.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-6](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0006.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-7](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0007.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-8](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0008.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-9](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0009.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-10](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0010.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-11](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0011.gif)
![[한국경제론] Labor Relation in Korea(노사관계)(영문)-12](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/457/456890-0012.gif)
분야
hwp1. The korea changed that paradigm of The industrialization and civilized turning point as 21st century had approached
2. whose type and how type is korea following? and what of interests?
3. The korea labor relations is better development of Europe type than that of U.S. type
Ⅱ. Subject
1. Korea labor relations situation
1) The present situation in labor relations
2) Relationship with government (political situation)
3) Workers and Management group
4) Korea labor Relations problem
2. Actually, Should we move toward The power U.S. labor relations type
1) U.S. labor relations circumstance
2) The problem and background that U.S. who is world giant enter to Decline
3) The labor relations problem of American society currently looking at the 21century
3. otherwise, how is case "another giant" Europe?
1) Situation of Europe labor relations(Sweden, France, Germany)
2) Importance of The government intervention when Europe just goes to show.
4. compare Europe with U.S
1) Relationship of The government
2) Between labor and management group
3) Labor negotiations
4) The korea has a point of similarity with Europe type
(1) Advantage of Europe labor relations (compared with korea)
(2) Europe capitalism and Korea
Ⅲ. Conclusion
1. seek necessary courses for progress from korea labor relations to Europe type
2. It is not "a complete change" but we Insist 'Development" to Europe type
3. "Discover" to "Korea type" labor relations in "Development" progress to Europe type
Suggested Problem - 21st century paradigm of industrial society is changing
Korea continues with economic growth, development and trade surplus despite the superficial external dependence. It is increasing its vulnerability to the external environment while the economic structure has changed. In addition to globalization in a rapidly aging nation, and women's expanding participation in the labor market, there are variations in the labor market. The realization of equal social welfare, the establishment of industrial democracy and a self-labor movement, shows conflicting industrial relations characterized by recurring extreme duress as yearly strikes in the industry remains a problem to be solved. In the eve of the 21st century digital economy there is growing need for a new construction.
Importance of Subject – Korea as a turning point
Korea's industrial development was in a relatively short period. The development of labor-management relations had in fact started the industrialization since the 1960s, and over 30 years substantial progress had been thorough. However, in such a short period of time, the political environment in Korea did not developed as much as the industry's growth. Currently the new world economic order is being reorganized. Korea, while maintaining the peace of the industry, should raise the competitiveness of enterprises. Above all, the importance of the role of labor and industrial relations system is needed for Korea’s situation to settle down while maintaining national competitiveness as a shortcut to success.
Development Direction - Labor relations in Korea should be pursued
As environmental change occur surrounding the tripartite task for cooperation in national competitiveness, improvement of labor market flexibility, employment stability, industrial cooperation and support for workplace innovation system can be summarize. Korea will aim for labor stability and competitive union institutions on par with Europe. However, to ensure participation in the management of enterprise-level institutional conditions, this tripartite system needs to operate effectively and to maximize the ability to highlight key issues. Therefore, the competitiveness of labor-management relations in the future and the value of social integration should be achieved at the same time. In an open market economy future industrial relations changes in Korea is required within the current polarization in Korean society. This also requires strategies for overcoming conflict.
한국과 미국의 노사관계 / 김상은 출판사 : 울산대학교 출판부 2009년
산업사회와 노동문제 / 이영희 출판사 : 비봉출판사 1992년
- 이성희 노동리뷰 (한국노동연구원) 2010년 1-2월호
- 김훈 노동리뷰(한국노동연구원) 2009년 1월호
- 김윤호 노동사회 2007년 2월호
현대노사관계론 -백석현
한국과 미국의 노사관계 -김상온
세계 각국의 노사관계 -그 변신과 탈락-김황조
상생노사관꼐와 공정보상 시스템-최종태
국제비교 고용관계- 그린J뱀버,러셀D란즈베리,닉웨일즈
임상훈, 『한국형 노사관계 모델(1)』, 한국노동연구원, 2005.
박종복, 『논점 노사관계론』, 法學社 , 2009.
조진탁, 『new 노사관계론』, 大經 , 2009.
Bamber, Greg, 『국제 비교 노사 관계』, 한국노동연구원, 1993.
민경호, 『현대 노사 관계론 : 인간존중 시대의 신경영 패러다임 』, 무역경영사, 2009.
김맹룡, 『노사관계의 올바른 理解』, 한빛, 2008.
은수미, 『비정규직과 한국 노사관계시스템의 변화.2, 한.미.일 비교를 중심으로』, 한국노동연구원, 은수미, 『비정규직과 한국 노사관계시스템의 변화.1』, 한국노동연구원, 2007.
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/industrialrelations/dictionary/dictionary0.htm
http://www.fangyuanfazhi.com/zazhi/fangyuanfazhi105/huati105/201003/t20100305_328245.html
http://www.51labour.com/labour-law/show-15487.html
http://view.news.qq.com/a/20080214/000021.htm
