[한국정치] 2010 서울시 교육감 선거에 대하여(영문)

 1  [한국정치] 2010 서울시 교육감 선거에 대하여(영문)-1
 2  [한국정치] 2010 서울시 교육감 선거에 대하여(영문)-2
 3  [한국정치] 2010 서울시 교육감 선거에 대하여(영문)-3
 4  [한국정치] 2010 서울시 교육감 선거에 대하여(영문)-4
 5  [한국정치] 2010 서울시 교육감 선거에 대하여(영문)-5
 6  [한국정치] 2010 서울시 교육감 선거에 대하여(영문)-6
※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.
  • 분야
  • 등록일
  • 페이지/형식
  • 구매가격
  • 적립금
자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
소개글
[한국정치] 2010 서울시 교육감 선거에 대하여(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1. Introduction
1) Influence of superintendent of education in Korea
2) Kwak’s victory

2. Result and Defect

3. Merits and Demerits of Party Nomination

4. Future Alternative
(1) Alternative of the result that party nomination didn’t made up.
(2) The future of the Kwak’s election
본문내용
2) Kwak’s victory
In the election which took place on June 2nd of 2010, the only liberal candidate, Kwak No-hyun won 34.34 percent of the votes, defeating conservative Lee Won-hee by only 1.12 percent. Kwak No Hyun was a presidential advisor under the late President Roh Moo Hyun, a professor at Korea National Open University and the former secretary-general of the National Human Rights Commission

Throughout their campaigns, the liberal candidates emphasized their opposition to education policies promulgated by President Lee Myung-bak’s administration. Kwak argued that the current policies are too “competition-oriented,” and stressed the need for education that builds students’ character and creativity. Kwak No Hyun vowed to provide free school meals and promised to reduce the student-teacher ratio per classroom to 25-1 while making the evaluation system for teachers more transparent.

Prior to the election, conservative Lee Won-hee, the former head of the Korean Federation of Teachers’ Association, was expected to be winning in local polls. While pledging to eliminate corruption in the education sector and reduce dependence on private education, Lee has stressed his disdain for the political activities of the Korean Teachers and Education Workers’ Union, saying its members clearly broke the law by engaging in political activities, and supported the Education Ministry’s dismissal of 134 unionized public school teachers. He also vowed that he will cut the unqualified, corrupt bottom 10 percent of teachers and push for more gifted schools and self-governing private high schools. Supporting dismissal of 134 teachers and his slogan of “Teachers also need a competition” seems to be the main reason why he got less support than that of Kwak.

Unlike Lee, Kwak said he will reduce the number of self-governing private high schools. They also differ on the teachers’ dismissal; Kwak said it wasn’t fair for the Education Ministry to have
오늘 본 자료
더보기
  • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
해당 정보 및 게시물의 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용,무단 전재·배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견 시 고객센터에 신고해 주시기 바랍니다.