소개글
게임 셧다운 제도 도입과 의사결정과정 연구(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1.Introduction
2.Literature Review
3.Research Design
4.Analysis
5.Conclusion
본문내용
The bill passed on : Apr. 2011
Began enforcing on : Nov. 2011
Criticism on effectiveness
How can we explain
the decision-making process?
Two faces of Power
want to solve conflict
non-decision making
: restricting the range of
decision-making by ma-
nipulating social values
and procedure
Fery said…
To prove non-decision making in policy, find
individual or organizational fail to attempt on
selection and intervention of issues.
Research Question
Why the bill was forced to be adopted, despite the criticism on its effectiveness?
Proposition
Non-decision making
Research Method & Frame
1. Study literature materials
2. Conducting interviews with Assemblyman
“I can say the bill is slightly harsh in terms of constitutional value(prohibiting excessive restriction).
I am skeptical that this kind of restriction will be effective in the long term.”
-Jin, Seongho. A newspaper interview. 11.05.13
not effective! but symbolic!
The bill cannot be applied to services outside of the country
이춘석, Legislation Committee, 10.4.27
Children are dying because of games, at this moment of discussion
최영희, Main assembly session, 11.4.29
Because youth’s level of happiness
is at the bottom of OECD, ‘shut-down rule’ have to be enforced
Non-decision making
→ partially applicable
Considering these examples which shows
the exercise of power and mobilization of biases about games.
Weak theoretical connection
unable to prove gov.–media connection
failed to get answers of the interview
Suggestion
proper research method
Participant observation of related officials
∵ further approach to inside materials