Overall, ratios and analysis of two companies indicate that McDonald’s performed better than Burger King.
In investor’s perspective, McDonald’s showed excellent stockperformance in terms of dividends and capital gains. Burger King, in contrast, had a negative stock return. Therefore, it is recommended to invest only in McDonald’s.
In creditor’s perspective, McDonald’s is more
Both companies are service companies
-> meaningless to use inventory related ratios
ROE 7.32% x retention ratio 100%
=7.32%
ROE 9.8% x retention ratio 80%
=7.84%
Stock price is much Lower than past
years but recovering business performance
=>probable potential to increase
Fully recovered stock price
& worsening performance
=> Very few potential to increase
stock of Apple Inc.? We acquired some hints from these graphs.
This is a graph for 3 years from February 2008 to November 2010. The 3 lines which are blue, red, and green represent Nasdaq, S&P 500 and Apple Inc. As we can see, Apple Inc moved together with other two types of index even though the stock price was different. For example, in the sub-prime mortgage, the performance of these three
ratio, current ratio, reserve ratio, etc.
Activeness : Company’s efficiency of specific assets’ operation
ex) total asset turnover ratio, receivable turnover ratio, etc.
- Value : Company’s value, divided into stock index and value index
- Stock Index ex) net profit per stock, net capital per stock, etc.
- Value Index ex) Price/Earnings ratio, price on book-value ratio, etc.
Part 1. Performance Analysis
ROE analysis
Both LGT & SKT had declining ROE
SKT had larger decrease (2.46% vs 1.11%)
LGT has larger ROE figure
LGT earns more profit per dollar of stockholder investment
Operating income margin shows contradicting results
SKT earns more operating profit per $1 of sales
SKT earns more net income per $1 of sales as well
SKT better performa