governments in the past and now they are democratic states.
So we can say they started democratizing from the same background. But they
chose different models while they were transferring power to civilian
government. Brazil chose top-down and Argentina adopted bottom-up model. We
are going to approach the topic from primarily qualitative method. Because,
Brazil and Argentina
democratization process after the era of
military governments.
Y : levels of democracy between Brazil and Argentina.
• Spatial & Temporal backgrounds
Spatial background : Brazil and Argentina
Temporal background : 1970s ~ 1980s
< Similarity >
• Same temporal background which faced on the period of the Cold War.
• In early days of ruling, they carry on their
Grand National Party (Hannara-dang) and United Democratic Party (Tonghap Minju-dang) are two major Political parties in Korea. Grand National Party ( Hannara-dang) agrees with import of American beef and United Democratic party (Tonghap Minju-dang ) disagrees with American beef. I divided their opinions as policies of government about import of American beef.
democratic governance)로서 노-사-정-민간의 사회적 대화가 절실히 필요한 요즘, 한국사회에서의 노사정위원회를 하나의 거버넌스로 보고 분석하고자 한다.
한국의 노사관계는 외국 기업들이 투자하기 꺼려하는 데에 큰 문제가 되어 왔으며, 특히 1997년 말 IMF 외환위기 이후에 기업을 대상으로 한 구조조정
governance. It is regarded for a long time that negotiating and mediating with private opinions is one of the key roles of government. There are more than 700,000 of private associations which are actively participating in public affairs.
Like this, France government has centralized strong power but also democratic and pluralistic. Korean government has something in common with it. we investi