international order. Therefore, both schools consider regimes to be the byproduct of states. Meanwhile Social Constructivists think the existence of rule or regime can make identical appearance of the world, but we do not handle Social Constructivism in this article to maintain the arguing point.
2) Different Assumptions
First of all, Liberal Instutionalists consider inter
1. Introduction
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is no longer a purely international economic organizationin the way it was. At first, the IMF was established along with the World Bank and theGeneral Agreement on Tariffs and Tradeat the close ofWorld War II in order to provide governments with balance of payments support, but now there’s a doubt that IMF has become a political organizat
international standards for protecting the right to information. However, the way the Chinese government manages the internet in accordance with law is a sovereign matter and foreign courts have no jurisdiction according to international law.
In addition, there are many broader structural problems with China's legal system that prevent the emergence of more liberal internet regulations. One key
is globalization, and that is to put on the one-size-fits-all Golden Straitjacket. There is no alternative.
The rich countries
They force developing countries to accept neo-liberalism in order to take their own profit from them
Pressure developing countries to take neo-liberalism.
Say that they will give assistance through IMF, WTO, World Bank
if they adopt neo-liberalism
(international institution)의 역할 미비(동서간, 남북간 분쟁으로 인해 마비상태), ④ 유럽에서의 초국가주의(supranationalism)는 과거 정부간 협상(intergovernmental bargaining) 즉 정부간주의(intergovernmentalism)에 의해 대체, ⑤ 선진 민주국가들은 무역과 통화에 있어서 갈등과 소련과의 경제관계를 둘러싼 불화를 경험