ROE analysis
Both LGT & SKT had declining ROE
SKT had larger decrease (2.46% vs 1.11%)
LGT has larger ROE figure
LGT earns more profit per dollar of stockholder investment
Operating income margin shows contradicting results
SKT earns more operating profit per $1 of sales
SKT earns more net income per $1 of sales as well
SKT better performance compared to LGT
Efficiency
LGT = much mo
investment
Operating income margin shows contradicting results
SKT earns more operating profit per $1 of sales
SKT earns more net income per $1 of sales as well
SKT better performance compared to LGT
Efficiency
LGT = much more efficient in utilizing its assets except in terms of receivables
Telecom companies Excluded Inventories
Working capital management
SKT = much more
efficiently manage and grow old in the future, and do not have the power, or when you are thinking of injustice that the purpose of preparing in advance, the stock has been promoting the project.
The project's progress is a how-to by touring a mock as investors set up investment and understand the market, without the risk of their investment strategy that meets the acquiring of the own niche.
efficient operating economics measured by operating expense ratio and high capital efficiency by net working capital ratio.
Among three other competitors, the most interesting international competitor to compare the financial performance was H&M. ROIC for H&M and Inditex are similar, 24.16% and 27.27% accordingly. Differential of both ROS and capital turnover for two companies are minimal: for