Pros ofHumanitarianIntervention
The legal argument
UN charter
1(3)
To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and
55
With a view
humanitarianintervention is an exception to this and has been frequently used to justify states’ acts in intervening other states’ affairs since the Second World War. Humanitarianintervention is an act that allows interfering in the domestic affairs of another state when citizen’s lives are at stake due to actions by their government. Supporters ofhumanitarianintervention argue that it
Introduction
Today’s China
Before we elaborate on our subject, we thought it is important to understand about the present situation of China. Thus, by comparing both China’s current and expected future situation, we’ve divided our sub-directions.
After implementing an open economy, China has been rapidly developing and eventually, they took a pos
2. Two Faces of American Foreign Policy : Realism and HumanitarianIntervention
1) U.S. and Realistic Foreign Policy
2) U.S. and HumanitarianIntervention
3. Iraq War and State of Egypt : Different Reaction of U.S.
1) A Case from the Iraq War
2) A Case from the State of Egypt
3) Iraq and Egypt : A Gap between Realism and HumanitarianIntervention
of Europe, rising communism centered from the Soviet Union. Then, we should consider of the fact that how did U.S. intervene to other countries.
This study is starting from Iraq war in 2003 and the state of Egypt in the beginning of 2011 that different reaction of American intervention of these two cases. From these cases, we would like to discuss about U.S' realistic face and humanitarian inter