Drawing on both agency and stewardship theories, we examine the changes made to board structures in response to deregulation and the consequences of those observed changes on firm performance. We test the hypotheses using longitudinal data from the
Current structure is not suitable for KT’s strategy. In telecommunication industry, there are three major companies. They are SKT, LG U+, and KT.
Until recently, these three companies fought each other, because of the government’s regulation.
KT wanted to be the top of their mobile telecommunication industry, so they chose differentiation for their strategy.
structure to telecommunications and internet centered structure, and they expanded the telecommunications business. In 2002, they concentrated to construct high-speed internet. KT has building global network.
KT was the best telecommunication company in Korea but today they are controversy because of restructuring issue. KT pushed ahead huge change in their organization in last April. Why is thi
I. Why ReignCom?
The reason that we selected ReignCom as our subject for analysis is because the company is an excellent example of how an organization can take steps in changing its structure to overcome poor progress.
Surely ReignCom had good times and its success story was a famous one in the industry. Things turned bad for the company within few years, with the advent of strong riva
knowing the fundamental problems of the corporate culture tried only to change the company by strategies which ended up in lack of motivation.
2-3. What structural problems contributed to the chain being slow to adapt to change?
- The primary aim of hybrid structure is to gather up all the advantages of each structures, minimize the disadvantages and implement the most effective division of