the UN charter 2:7 article. The idea of humanitarian intervention is contested because of its links to the principles of sovereignty, non-intervention and non-use of force. Humanitarian intervention poses its test for justification.
.
.
.
.
.
A clear definition of humanitarian intervention remains puzzling. Wheeler said “the society of states has committed itself to a humanrights culture
andhumanitarian intervention which reflects two faces of their foreign policy.
U.S. attacked Iraq under the reason of protection of liberalism andthey justifies that it was a humanitarian intervention, but why did the U.S. connived 30years of dictatorship of Mubarak's regime in Egypt? Is it because of the liberalism andhumanrights issues in Egypt in international society was on right track?
the parliament in case they lose people’s confidence. It is differentiated from many other presidential system in other nations. Also, France has the concept of strong state(Etat puissant). Strong state is trying to protect public interests. The majority of French people have positive views on France government. They think that their country is protecting them performing impartial and legalisti
Pros of Humanitarian Intervention
The legal argument
UN charter
1(3)
To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for humanrights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and
55
With a view
and "order between younger and elder", in which hierarchy and mutual respect were observed as basic courtesies. There was also customary respect for the Confucian sages Confucius and Mencius, whose teachings were rigorously studied. Also, much research was invested into the question of how kings and ministers might rule like the ancient sages. Efforts to realize the ideal state were grounded in C