evaluated all the universities in Korea according to its criteria and universities that scored less than 15% from the poorest were selected as poor performance universities. As a result, some universities were selected as poor performance universities.
However, the list caused a lot of controversy about the criteria of selection. People wondered how the government selected poor performance univ
ofeducation, life expectancy, urbanization, corruption perception index, CO2 emission. We excluded the innate and natural factors here because those factors are not easy to identify the difference between indicators, additionally when there is homogeneity between countries, those factors cannot be the critical variables to evaluate our model for IQ. The following is the definition of our predict
of the good job center. This is about making centers stronger and more efficient at working by mergering. If the IL centers get unified, their financial aids will be better distributed. However, this still ignores the power of the higher organizations and if there are some conflicts, there is no wat to solve since each center has the same power.
5. Soft System Model 5 : Comparison between ‘I
of the organization
- Bring all employees into the decision making process
- Trust people and their ability to contribute to the mission
- Place emphasis on prevention and problem solving work
- Treat each other with dignity and respect
2) Do they have long term vision?
① Evaluation
Evaluation(I ): very good ( v) good ( ) average ( ) bad ( ) very bad ( )
Evaluation(E): very
of them lack appropriate conceptual model according to which the each competitiveness can be calculated and compared. Obviously, cultural factor has played a significant role in Wal-Mart’s failure. But, if we do not have a deep understanding of factors such as market conditions, companies’ strategies, and consumer sophistications, cultural approaches can become a lopsided interpretation of th