① Contraction with “not”
(3) a. He shouldn’t see her.
b. *He worksn’t with her
→ Main verbs cannot contract with not.
(4) a. He may not come.
b. *He mayn’t come.
c. We shan’t be very long.
d. We won’t be very long.
→ May cannot contract with not.
Shan’t exists only in British English.
② Subject-aux inversion in yes/no questions &
tag questions
verbs, 2) modalverbs, and 3) relative pronouns. Therefore we deal with the 3parts and the reason why we chose those 3 parts as the most difficult lesson for the Korean students in the rationale and introduce the way they are shown in the textbook with its weakness and recommendation in the main discourse.
2) Rationale
we choose the three topics as the most difficult part of grammar that th
form), -ly(adverb), and -tion(to make a noun form), it cannot make difference of their meanings in terms of semantics, but just changes their forms. Therefore, in order to change or add the meaning in a sentence, English needs prepositions, conjunctions as well as modalverbs. But, Korean doesn't need them.
For example let us think of those verbs “eat” in English and 먹다 in Korean.
modality)와 명제(proposition)로 구성되고, 양태는 부정, 시제, 법, 상 등으로 구성되어 있으며, 명제는 동사와 하나 또는 그 이상의 격을 가진 명사구로 구성된다고 보았던 것이다. 대표적인 격관계는 다음과 같다.
① 행위자(agent) : 사건의 시발자
② 반행위자(counteragent) : 행위가 수행되는 데 대한 반대적인