All famous people’s privacy must be protected
Some people says that ordinary people have righttoknow about famous people’s privacy.
But too much concern can push them to suicide themselves because of mental depression.
There are three main ideas to support our presentation.
Public figures have human rights.
You may think that they should endure their privacy exposure because th
to the land -mark decision,
If the plaintiff (See & Lee) doesn’t sue the defendant
( Media & puplic), even though they have been damaged their social value, the defamation law doesn’t work.
Moreover, It cannot be concluded as an Invasion of Privacy here on account of that they are definitely public figures.
The media has an obligation to tell the truth
When the media to report an
People have righttoknow
The public figure’s salary is paid by the
people.
The public figure’s decisions affect people’s
lives in many ways.
Should be appreciated by their performances
Hard to concentrate on their performances
Public Library, et al. v. United States (http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/
edelman/mul-v-us/). He generated this list by collecting all 797 results from Google listings in
response to an October 2001 Web search using the search criteria “free adult sex.” He removed two pages because they didn’t include sexually explicit images. Of the 752 pages still providing content at the time of ou
것에 의해 행동하려 한다.
⑥ 수용자와 매스미디어 사이의 관계는 비인간적이다.
(2) 이용자
라디오와 텔레비전을 포함한 방송프로그램을 듣고 보는 정보수신자(receiver) 또는 미디어 이용자(user)를 뜻한다. 공중(public)으로서의 수용자가 개인적 차원의 미디어 이용을 사회적 차원으로 승화시