In each case , I will state the trend rather broadly , but I will restrict my comments to the implications for the public service .
각 경우에, 나는 동향을 언급할 것입니다, 그러나 나는 공무를 위해 나의 논평을 제한할 것입니다.
I would suggest the following :
나는 다음을 제안합니다 : .
1 .An extraordinary explosion of new knowledge and techno
문화를 만들어내고 이는 결국 시장의 비효율성(시장실패, 역자 주)을 야기한다.
International Journal of Public
Sector Management, Vol. 10 No. 5,
1997, pp. 311-330. ?MCB
University Press, 0951-3558
This paper develops some of the concepts in EDI's working paper "The Role of a National
Integrity System in Fighting Corruption", The World Bank, 1997.
IJPSM
publicadministration) -> 신행정국가의 출현 촉진
- 사람의 변화 : 인구노령화 + 젊은층 인구의 감소 = 의료비와 연금 지출 팽창
- 기술의 변화 : 물리적 · 사회적 기술발전으로 정부만의 문제해결 능력 부식
- 장소의 변화 : 활발한 인구이동 등 예) 범국가적 기업, 낮은 임금, 낮은 지대
- 철
administration paradigm = bureaucracy
1970's Anti-government, tax, bureaucracy
new managerialism (UK)/ entrepreneurial government
(USA)
the government can’t resolve
social, economic issues
for increasing national competitiveness
recession period of 80” fiscal crisis
demand of public reform
Intro
Luther gulick and his writings are directly and obviously central to those concerns.
Gulick’s
first publication in 1920
(a book-length version og his doctoral dissertation)
last publication in 1990
(an article in PublicAdministration Review)
Gulick’s work reflects many of the emphases of the reform movement of the early twentieth century as it applied to public-sector orga