<과학의 목적>
1. 근본목적: 이론개발
2. 하위목적
3. 지식의 제공: 당위가 아니라 존재에 대한 관심
4. 규칙성을 알림: 이론과 법칙으로 일반화
5. 변수들 간의 관계기술: 특히 인과관계의 기술
6. 이론을 바탕으로 현상을 예측: 신뢰성 있는 예측
<과학적 연구의 특징>
1. 결정론적(모든 현
Definition
A schematic representation which shows a predicate together with its arguments, and their categorical status.
Devour (verb)
[1, 2]
Predicate and arguments
Predicate: it is that we will refer to element that require the specification of the participants in the proposition expressed.
Argument: it is that a participant (role player) in proposition
Ex) The cro
let's define what is comparative structure.
(1) Nobody arrived except John.
(2) uk-i-bakk-e sukcey-lul ha-ci-anh-ass-ta.
uk-COM-DELI assignment-ACC do-COMP-not-PAST-DECL.
'Nobody finished the assignment except Uk'
In those cases, English and Korean sentences imply comparison meaning.
We need to define a sentence's semantic features and, at the same time, to define
Big(“about size”) vs Red(“about color”)
: too few semantic features
- Antonym(x)
Buy(“change in possession”) vs Sell(“change in possession”)
: share all but one semantic feature(direction of the change)
- Antonym(O)
1.5.1.Semantic Features of Nouns
1.5.2.Semantic Features of Verbs
1.5.3.Semantic Features interact with different a
semantic properties of both its 1) subject
Ex. Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. -> semantically anomalous!
- “sleep” require animate subjects.
and its 2) complements.
Ex. (1) John threw/tosses/kicked/flung the boy the ball.
(2) *John pushed/pulled/lifted/hauled the boy the ball.
(3)Mary faxed/radioed/e-mailed/phoned Helen the news.
(4)*Mary murmured/mumbled/muttered/shrieked He