Structure
Current structure is not suitable for KT’s strategy. In telecommunication industry, there are three major companies. They are SKT, LG U+, and KT.
Until recently, these three companies fought each other, because of the government’s regulation.
KT wanted to be the top of their mobile telecommunication industry, so they chose differentiation for their strategy.
Unfortunately
structure to telecommunications and internet centered structure, and they expanded the telecommunications business. In 2002, they concentrated to construct high-speed internet. KT has building global network.
KT was the best telecommunication company in Korea but today they are controversy because of restructuring issue. KT pushed ahead huge change in their organization in last April. Why is thi
structural change strategy)
현재의 기업의 구조에 변화를 가져오게끔 하려는 전략인데 다음의 두 가지로 나누어진다.
능력강화전략(distinctive competence strategy) : 제품개발능력, 생산능력 및 마케팅능력 등을 강화하려는 것으로서 이를 위해 인재를 투입하고 교육?설비투자를 하는 전략이다.
구조적 합리화전
I. Why ReignCom?
The reason that we selected ReignCom as our subject for analysis is because the company is an excellent example of how an organization can take steps in changing its structure to overcome poor progress.
Surely ReignCom had good times and its success story was a famous one in the industry. Things turned bad for the company within few years, with the advent of strong riva
2. Strategical changes due to privatization
According to miles and snow's corporate strategy analysis, KT&G is undertaking the Analyzer approach. In order to satisfy the taste of various customers' needs, KT&G is pouring immense asset into R&D, and it also adopted the brand manager to adapt itself into the changing environment. Considering the fact that KT&G was closer to defender approach i