of seven historical cases where one power approximated or surpassed another, conflict occurred.
이것은 옳을 수도 있고 아닐 수도 있다. 그러나 분명한 것은 미국과 중국간의 잠재적 긴장을 방치하는 것이 부정적인 결과를 초래할 것이다. 한 세력이 다른 세력에 근접하거나 이를 능가하는 역사적 사례를 보면 7건 중 6건의 충
of Foreign Affairs, Elizabeth Economy and Adam Segal suggest that placing the US-China relationship within a more inclusive context involving other states will lead to a bilateral solution.
This may or may not be correct. What is certainly true, however, is that neglecting the potential tensions in the US-China relationship will guarantee a negative outcome. In six of seven historical cases wh
of Foreign Affairs, Elizabeth Economy and Adam Segal suggest that placing the US-China relationship within a more inclusive context involving other states will lead to a bilateral solution.
This may or may not be correct. What is certainly true, however, is that neglecting the potential tensions in the US-China relationship will guarantee a negative outcome. In six of seven historical cases wh
of Foreign Affairs, Elizabeth Economy and Adam Segal suggest that placing the US-China relationship within a more inclusive context involving other states will lead to a bilateral solution.
This may or may not be correct. What is certainly true, however, is that neglecting the potential tensions in the US-China relationship will guarantee a negative outcome. In six of seven historical cases wh
of Foreign Affairs, Elizabeth Economy and Adam Segal suggest that placing the US-China relationship within a more inclusive context involving other states will lead to a bilateral solution.
This may or may not be correct. What is certainly true, however, is that neglecting the potential tensions in the US-China relationship will guarantee a negative outcome. In six of seven historical cases wh