[국제커뮤니케이션] 중국내 표현의 자유-구글 사례중심으로(영문)

※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.

분야
등록일
페이지/형식
구매가격
적립금

레포트 > 경제경영계열
2011.10.05
12페이지 / doc
1,400원
42원 (구매자료 3% 적립)

자료 다운로드 네이버 로그인

추천자료

[국제커뮤니케이션] 중국내 표현의 자유-구글 사례중심으로(영문)

아이돌 산업의 글로벌화 한국 음반시장의 해외진출 K팝한류지수 글로벌 전략 현지화 전략

[마케팅원론] 다음 기업분석

라인 연혁 라인 글로벌 사례 라인의 전망 라인 마케팅 라인 성공사례

3M 국제마케팅 레포트

[글로벌브랜드커뮤니케이션전략] 네이버 프랑스전략

[벤처창업] NHN의 성공사례 분석

구글 등의 인터넷망에 대한 문제, 웹 2.0에 대한 문제

[홍보론] KTF 쇼(SHOW)를 통한 홍보사례

[국제경영] 세계 1위 구글 google - 기업전략 경영혁신 성공요인 마케팅전략 4p stp swot 분석(HWP)

소개글

[국제커뮤니케이션] 중국내 표현의 자유-구글 사례중심으로(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.

Contents
1. Introduction
2. Research object and methods
3. News analysis
1) News coverage in China
2) News coverage in international news agencies
3) News coverage in Korea
4. Result of analysis
5. Conclusion

본문내용

2) News coverage in international news agencies
Covering the troubled situations between Google and China, most of news agencies, even Aljazeera, take a biased attitude toward Google. It is because ‘Free flow of information’ ideology was practically accepted to most part of the world after the Cold War, capitalism and democracy winning. Nowadays, freedom of speech is naturally needed to healthy country, so China is facing all these nations’ blaming that China restricts the rights of Chinese people. Google, the famous search engine website over the world, is trying to advance to the mainland of China since 2000. In first time, China Government avoided the coming of other countries’ internet companies, because it was afraid of their business’ policy can be dangerous to its centralization of power. It demanded the companies to keep its National Security Law. Google had to follow the law to start its business. Recent years Google is raising the standard of rebellion, at the same time, China is also fighting Google pressing its beneficial foundation. Most of the opinions are represented by the view of U.S.A. International agencies showed a tendency to protect Google’s standpoint. They generally describe Google as an agent of justice and China as a dictator.
An article named ‘What Happens as Google Uncensors Search in China?’ by the New York Times included interviews of Chinese internet users showed an opinion for justification of Google’s withdrawal in China. The interviewees are almost university students and they welcomed Google’s movement because of free accessibility to learn and get any information they want. These interviews tried to send the idea that the tendency in China is every netizens support Google totally. The report also called the case ‘One-sided censorship of China’ by quoting the interviewees’ statements. By showing Chinese people’s real thoughts, the article looks objective surely.
The New York Times pressed another article ‘Google, Citing Attack, Threatens to Exit China’. The report confirms that hacking on G-mail was China’s doing in spite of official denial of China. It mentioned the Google’s motto ‘Don’t be evil’ to show that Google’s withdrawal is for justice and freedom. Also, the writer kept pointing out the reality that how the censorship blocks the information and human rights in China which is against the world trends.
As well as the News from CNN was not different at all. They tend to use hostile expressions like ‘Struggle with China’, or ‘Threatens to exit’ in the news reports. ‘Google Threatens to Exit China’ covered Google keep its belief although it may lose its financial profit, and comment one-sided china’s view shortly.

3) News coverage in Korea
Korean media maintain their objectivities covering the news of each side. Commonly, the Korean media reported both different attitudes of China insisting no company can be an exception of National Security Law, and U.S.A insisting China Government should guarantee the freedom of sharing information. In this case, Korean news agencies are holding a balance in general. Most news of Korean broadcasts and newspapers were delivering more objectively than news of U.S.A or China. Usually the coverage was founded on factual events, with neutral stands. News of Korean media also

참고문헌

Reference
1. Blog.heritage.org
2. Internet should be free but regulated, CHINA DAILY, 2010-01-26
3. No absolute free flow of information, CHINA DAILY, 2010-01-26
4. Google's groundless accuses hurt global trust on Internet, CNTV, 2011-06-03
5. Chinese experts blast Google for "politicizing" trade rules, Xinhua news, 2010-06-18
6. 中国拒绝"政治的谷歌"与"谷歌的政治"(China refused to” Political Google”), Xinhua news. 2010-03-20
7. Blog of Dan Schiller, http://danschiller.info/
8. Free Flow of Information and Profit? , Huffpost Tech, 2011-03-04
9. Huffington Post: Google in China timeline

#중국내 #구글 #사례중심 #커뮤니케이션 #국제커뮤니케이션

오늘 본 자료

오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.

이 분야 인기자료

이 분야 신규자료