[산업재산법]Brenner v. Manson(1966) The Utility Requirement(영문)

[산업재산법]Brenner v. Manson(1966) The Utility Requirement(영문)-3

[산업재산법]Brenner v. Manson(1966) The Utility Requirement(영문)-4

[산업재산법]Brenner v. Manson(1966) The Utility Requirement(영문)-5

[산업재산법]Brenner v. Manson(1966) The Utility Requirement(영문)-6

[산업재산법]Brenner v. Manson(1966) The Utility Requirement(영문)-7

[산업재산법]Brenner v. Manson(1966) The Utility Requirement(영문)-8

[산업재산법]Brenner v. Manson(1966) The Utility Requirement(영문)-9

※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.

분야
등록일
페이지/형식
구매가격
적립금

레포트 > 사회계열
2010.08.26
9페이지 / pptx
900원
27원 (구매자료 3% 적립)

자료 다운로드 네이버 로그인

추천자료

[경제] 정글속의 먹이사슬의 M&A교훈

[언론] 언론사 시험문제 모음

[논문번역&요약]The role of the public administration in fighting corruption

[북한경제의이해] 베트남과 북한 경제 정책에 영향을 준 외부적 요인들(번역)

[교통] 교통공학

소개글

[산업재산법]Brenner v. Manson(1966) The Utility Requirement(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.

1. Facts
1-1 Fact summary
1-2 Issues
2. Conclusion
2-1 Holding
2-2 Dissent
2-3 Conclusion

본문내용

Manson attempt to patent a chemical process for synthesizing certain steroidal compounds which has only utility to aid in research.
However, Manson did not know whether his steroid actually worked.

The patent office denied the application because the process was not useful.
The US Supreme court argued that
In order to deserve that monopoly you have to show that your idea is really useful to society.

It is because the US Supreme Court felt that giving a patent for a process with no known uses would discourage others from trying to find a use for that.
"Unless and until a process is refined and developed to this point - where specific benefit exists in currently available form - there is insufficient justification for permitting an applicant to engross what may prove to be a broad field.“

#Utility #Manson #산업재산법 #Requirement

오늘 본 자료

오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.

이 분야 인기자료

이 분야 신규자료