It seems plausible to assume that the source of the ambiguity of [an old French student] is structural in nature, and that part of the ambiguity relates to the fact that ‘old’ and ‘French’ has two different categorical functions above. We can support this analysis with empirical evidences according to syntactic, semantic, and phonological views.
1. Syntactic analysis
As you can see, [a
function. It has as its foundation current knowledge about language development as a constructive, meaning-oriented process in which language is viewed as an authentic, natural, real-world experience, and language learning is perceived as taking place through functional reading and writing situations." (p. 458) (Lapp, D. & Flood, J. (1992). Teaching reading to every child. (3rd ed.). New York: Ma
(1) 즉각적 반향언어 (immediate echolalia)
(2) 지연된 반향언어 (delayed echolalia)
4) 구체적이고 융통성이 없는 언어 (concrete and literal language)
대화를 하는데 있어 그 뜻이나 의미를 효과적으로 이해하지 못한다. 특히 보다 기능이 좋은 자폐증의 경우 풍부한 어휘력으로 인해 타인들의 기대치가 높기 때문에
Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana. Oettinger (1966)
컴퓨터가 자연적인 언어(natural language)를 처리하도록 하는 데에 있어서의 어려움에 대한 초기의 연구에서, Anthony Oettinger는 우리가 예상되는 구조(expected structure)에 기반하여 어떻게 문장을 번역하는지, 그리고 우리가 번역하며 오류를 범했을 때,
Construct of CC (Michael Canale & Merril Swain)
Grammatical Competence
: aspect of CC that encompasses “knowledge of lexical items and rules of morphology, syntax, sentence-grammar semantics, and phonology.”
Discourse Competence
: the ability we have to connect sentences in stretches of discourse and to form a meaningful whole out of a series of utterances.
→ Reflect the us