It seems plausible to assume that the source of the ambiguity of [an old French student] is structural in nature, and that part of the ambiguity relates to the fact that ‘old’ and ‘French’ has two different categorical functions above. We can support this analysis with empirical evidences according to syntactic, semantic, and phonological views.
1. Syntactic analysis
As you can see, [a
하였다. 구조 분석에 대한 최근의 시도에서는, 우리가 문장들을 “만들어(generate)”내기 위해 사용하는 기저의 규칙 체계에 대해 더 많이 집중한다.
<1> Syntactic Rules : 통사 규칙
우리가 언어의 통사론에 대해 분석하기 위해 우리는 “유일하면서도 전부인(all and only)” 기준에 충실하려고(adhere) 한다.
진화되고 있으며, 종말적인 형태로 그 전모를 재촉하기는 불가능하다.
-1965년 그의 대표작 「Aspects of he theory of syntax」이후 언어학에서는 케이스문법(case grammar)이나 생성의미론(generative semantics) 등으로 다양하게 전개되고 있음. 그러나 이런 것들도 촘스키의 영향과 무관하다고 말하기는 곤란하다.
syntactic standard to make the comparatives.
(중략)
We can recognize in both languages that target and standard of comparison in both in Korean and English are usually expressed in a sentence, because comparison is completed when two things or events exist.
But there are some exceptions.
(5) This desk is more bigger.
(6) i chayksang-i te khuda.
this desk-NOM more big
Morphology
Morphology is the study of word formation. (p.79)
‘morphe’ = to form (Greek)
Morphology → the structure of words
Syntax → the structure of sentences
Issues in Morphology
(1) Boldest can be divided into two parts (i.e., bold
+est), each of which has a meaning: bold cannot.
☞ Morphemes
(2) The word boy has a meaning in and of itself, the