소개글
[중국경제론] China Forum Shanghai(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1.Purpose of the Study
2.Explanation on China’s Catch-up
3.Is China following the East Asian Model?
4.China leapfrogging East Asian Model?
5.Need to re-think about China’s model:East Asian, Anglo-Saxon or Beijing model?
6.Washington Consensus or East Asian Consensus
7.China follows the East Asian Sequencing
8.Korea vs. Taiwan
9.China mixing Korea and Taiwan
10.Unique Chinese Mode: Beijing Consensus
11.Summary
12.Challenges ahead for China
본문내용
Purpose of the Study
To put China’s catch-up strategies into international comparisons.
Washington Consensus;
East Asian model;
To figure out the uniqueness of Chinese catch-up strategies: Beijing Consensus?
To assess Prospect of China
Explanation on China’s Catch-up
Traditional explanation on China’s reform success
Took advantage of ‘comparative advantage’ in labor intensive goods (Justin Lin et al 1996)
Characteristic: A comparison between China’s pre-reform era (socialist command economy) and post-reform era (marketized economy).
Further task need to be done
Identifying the Chinese catch-up strategy in comparison with others: Washington Consensus or East Asian models
Is China following the East Asian Model?
In relation to “East Asian Model”…
Questions: China would achieve another ‘East Asian Miracle’? China could avoid another financial crisis?
Some argued that China is following Japan-Korea model (Li and Lian 1999; Li, Li, and Zhang 2000)
“market-preserving authoritarianism”
Some argued that China is more likely follow the Anglo-American model (Qian and Weingast 1996)
“market-preserving federalism”