![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-1](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0001.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-2](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0002.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-3](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0003.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-4](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0004.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-5](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0005.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-6](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0006.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-7](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0007.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-8](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0008.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-9](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0009.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-10](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0010.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-11](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0011.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-12](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0012.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-13](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0013.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-14](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0014.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-15](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0015.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-16](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0016.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-17](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0017.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-18](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0018.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-19](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0019.gif)
![[국제무역론] The US-EC GMO Dispute-20](http://images.happyhaksul.com/thumb/467/466300-0020.gif)
분야
ppt2.What the US insists
3.What the EU insists
4.Dispute Settlement Process
5.Conclusion &
6.Q&A
- Moratorium to GMO
- Safe guard action to GMO
The Point of Issue
- ‘SPS Treaty’ & ‘TBT Treaty’
- Scientific Proofs
- ‘Biosafety protocol’
- ‘Undue Delay’
The ‘suspension’ and ‘failure’ by the EU to consider applications for approval of GM products (the ‘de facto moratorium’)
The national bans in Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Italy and Luxembourg on some GM products which had already been approved in European Union before October 1998
GMO issue is not appropriate to be handled solely by WTO
- Social, economical as well as political
- US unilaterally enforcing the issue by concentrating solely on economical dimension
GMO must be dealt with through “international cooperation”
US must not enforcement must not deteriorate other states’ autonomy
